<![CDATA[New tuner]]>Hi. I'm Shannon and I drive a dropped Blue '93 Dodge Dakota. I'm from north fargo.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/1323/new-tunerRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 22:28:02 GMTSun, 16 Jan 2005 16:29:29 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:56:41 GMT]]>Once I get enough money to get the motor I plan on building it up

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/28098https://fargostreet.com/post/28098Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:56:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:43:27 GMT]]>Are you going to run the stock turbo on there or upgrade?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/27938https://fargostreet.com/post/27938Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:43:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Wed, 02 Feb 2005 05:08:32 GMT]]>My profile pic is the turbo3 setup 2.2l

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/27886https://fargostreet.com/post/27886Wed, 02 Feb 2005 05:08:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:06:27 GMT]]>yeah the dsm was made to replace the starquest(starion/conquest for those that dont know) in SCCA i believe

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/25465https://fargostreet.com/post/25465Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:06:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:02:43 GMT]]>i've been looking, and i couldn't find any sort of code for the 2.2l in the daytona, laser, sundance, etc... i don't think any of us are in a position to wonder about the change of engines. my only thought is that someone decided a fwd sports car had to be made, so the g54b (2.6l turbo in the starquest) was dropped and the 4g63 came to be in a fwd platform

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/25464https://fargostreet.com/post/25464Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:02:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:53:05 GMT]]>i stand corrected on the laser, but that was before i was born, sorry. That would be a fun project. Why did they drop the displacement for the 4g63. or is that because it was then made by DSM?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/25441https://fargostreet.com/post/25441Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:53:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:20:42 GMT]]>i knew some one that was selling a spirit r/t for like a grand...i just dont remember who it was

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24954https://fargostreet.com/post/24954Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:20:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:16:42 GMT]]>Your right now if I can find a place that has a motor like that for sale I'll be in good shape.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24952https://fargostreet.com/post/24952Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:16:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:13:23 GMT]]>thats the 2.2dohc...it was actually 227hp i believe 😉 it also came in spirit r/ts besides the shelby iroc daytona

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24951https://fargostreet.com/post/24951Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:13:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:37:09 GMT]]>yeah the 2.2's with the type III turbo setup ran 225 hp stock in the daytona's.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24946https://fargostreet.com/post/24946Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:37:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:02:20 GMT]]>The Chrysler turbo motors have some potential; I'm pretty sure the 14 sec. minivan uses one. I've always wanted to find an old turbo Sundance or something for a project.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24933https://fargostreet.com/post/24933Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:02:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:44:23 GMT]]>

LankorDie wrote:
Ok call me stupid but why drop a truck? Trucks are made for off road use and for moving in and out of houses.
i like the way alot of dropped trucks look. theres some nice lookin S-10s and dakots ive seen around here.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24903https://fargostreet.com/post/24903Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:44:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:42:47 GMT]]>if i'm not mistaken. i'm not referring to the 89+ laser, but the OLD one that looks kind of like a daytona. they were all made by chrysler, the 2.2 and 2.5 were chrysler's i4 powerplants... so it stands to reason that the 2.2 would be the engine in the laser

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24896https://fargostreet.com/post/24896Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:42:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:46:39 GMT]]>i wasn't aware that the laser was a 2.2, wasn't it a 4g63? And trucks could be fast, just gotta treatem right, the 2.2 is a strong motor.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24894https://fargostreet.com/post/24894Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:46:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:27:44 GMT]]>

out there wrote:
yes, the 2.2 is the daytona, charger, old laser and omni. the 2.5 was in the lebaron, celebrity (nt) and a couple of other cars that i can't recall

umm the celebrity was definately a GM product there buddy...acclaim, spirit

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24738https://fargostreet.com/post/24738Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:27:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:25:08 GMT]]>I want to stay with this motor because I've done most of the research for it and it's something DIFFERENT.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24737https://fargostreet.com/post/24737Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:25:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:21:20 GMT]]>Its 2wd and it's no good for off roading. But it is good for moving because you don't have to lift stuff that hight to get it in.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24735https://fargostreet.com/post/24735Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:21:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:51:55 GMT]]>Ok call me stupid but why drop a truck? Trucks are made for off road use and for moving in and out of houses.

And Spoolude your sex comment is way off,
"Sex should be like a riced out honda, fast and asian."-Lankordie

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24729https://fargostreet.com/post/24729Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:51:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:12:32 GMT]]>

wannabe wrote:
LMFAO...shut up!
hey it almost the same amout of displacment and a better motor but ya lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24680https://fargostreet.com/post/24680Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:12:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:08:04 GMT]]>

spoolude wrote:
just get a h23 vtec and turbo that
LMFAO...shut up!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24675https://fargostreet.com/post/24675Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:08:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:01:40 GMT]]>just get a h23 vtec and turbo that

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24671https://fargostreet.com/post/24671Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:01:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:58:33 GMT]]>yes, the 2.2 is the daytona, charger, old laser and omni. the 2.5 was in the lebaron, celebrity (nt) and a couple of other cars that i can't recall

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24669https://fargostreet.com/post/24669Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:58:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:09:54 GMT]]>The 2.2l I4 is out of a daytona or charger. The 2.2 and 2.5 use the same block.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24645https://fargostreet.com/post/24645Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:09:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New tuner on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:57:07 GMT]]>

Loki2678 wrote:
Basicly take everything from the head up ona 2.2l turbo motor and convert my 2.5 to a turbo and fuel injected 2.5. Does gravedigger own a tiberaun?

What kind of vehicle is the turbo motor from? I didnt know you could do a turbo swap to one of those.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/24636https://fargostreet.com/post/24636Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:57:07 GMT