<![CDATA[Barack Obama Test]]>http://barackobamatest.com/

How do you score?

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 44 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 94% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/15074/barack-obama-testRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 16:54:45 GMTWed, 10 Sep 2008 20:50:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:43:58 GMT]]>http://franz.org/quiz.htm

I like this test much better (even though it doesn't give you a current candidate). I scored a 19 on it...just slightly left of center.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223725https://fargostreet.com/post/223725Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:43:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:32:36 GMT]]>That test is honestly retarded and ridicoulously biased, and im not even an obama supporter. Stuff like 4 answers to 1 question, if you pick any of the 3 others, you disagree. And some people say....... and all they do is point out the negatives of each issue. And they only bring up the issues, and ask questions that people are likely too oppose him on. And finally the results, you disagree with Obama on XX% of issues, even though most questions were relating to the same issues (it should be, you disagree with Obama on XX% of these questions).

I could go on all day about how stupidly biased this test was and the results show absolutely nothing.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223721https://fargostreet.com/post/223721Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:32:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:28:25 GMT]]>but anyway...disagreed 32 of 47 BASED ON THE WORDING OF THE QUESTIONS. The above are just a few ways that this test was flawed.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223719https://fargostreet.com/post/223719Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:28:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:25:31 GMT]]>Under health care it talks about his plan covering illegals...it is wrong:

JOE JOHNS (CNN correspondent): Senator Obama, we all know what universal health care is, as Senator Clinton just said, sort of the idea that everybody deserves health care. And I have not been able to sort of zero in on your position on this one question: Does your plan cover the estimated 12 million or so illegal immigrants in the country?

OBAMA: It does not.

JOHNS: Why not?

OBAMA: Well, because I think we've got limited resources. And it is important for us that, when we've got millions of U.S. citizens that aren't yet covered, it's important for us to make sure that they are provided coverage.

I do think that we have an obligation to make sure that children are covered. And we want to make sure that they are not sick in the emergency room.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010011

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223718https://fargostreet.com/post/223718Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:25:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:24:13 GMT]]>Dude, the world is flat. Deal with it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223717https://fargostreet.com/post/223717Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:24:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:19:39 GMT]]>#9...same section who are "some" of these people. Some people say the world is flat. They are wrong too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223716https://fargostreet.com/post/223716Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:19:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:18:44 GMT]]>#8 on the same section states that Obama's plan increases national debt by 3.3 trillion in 10 years...yet McCains increases it by 5.7 trillion....loaded question.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223715https://fargostreet.com/post/223715Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:18:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:16:27 GMT]]>

MisterCMK;235176 wrote:
Finish the test Chuck

I am right now actually...under taxes it states that obama would have taxes at 55%+ but I find NOTHING that can solidly support that claim

http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/27/news/economy/obama_wealthy_taxes/index.htm?postversion=2008062809

Obama would restore the top two income tax rates to their pre-2001 levels of 36% and 39.6%. Currently they're 33% and 35%.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223713https://fargostreet.com/post/223713Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:16:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:52:31 GMT]]>

tjamz;235173 wrote:
kinda hard when the first portion is almost 100% abortion related...how many times can you really ask the same question? I didn't finish the test because I got tired of answering the same answer over and over.

Lol exactly...it also seemed like some of the possible choices were more than just yes or no questions.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223710https://fargostreet.com/post/223710Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:52:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:52:29 GMT]]>Finish the test Chuck

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223709https://fargostreet.com/post/223709Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:52:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:47:29 GMT]]>kinda hard when the first portion is almost 100% abortion related...how many times can you really ask the same question? I didn't finish the test because I got tired of answering the same answer over and over.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223706https://fargostreet.com/post/223706Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:47:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:27:24 GMT]]>

inspector01;235166 wrote:
im gonna guess that this is set up to be a biased test....

I agree. Check out the wording on some of it.

but

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 41 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 87% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223704https://fargostreet.com/post/223704Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:27:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:18:35 GMT]]>I don't support either way, but im gonna guess that this is set up to be a biased test....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223699https://fargostreet.com/post/223699Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:18:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:00:15 GMT]]>You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 36 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 77% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223697https://fargostreet.com/post/223697Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:00:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:48:13 GMT]]>lol

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 43 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 91% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223692https://fargostreet.com/post/223692Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:48:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:22:08 GMT]]>You AGREED with Barack Obama on 47 of the 47 test questions. This means you agree with the Obama position 100% of the time. You are truely a fucking dumbass.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223686https://fargostreet.com/post/223686Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:22:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:54 GMT]]>You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 46 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 98% of the time.

lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223685https://fargostreet.com/post/223685Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:21:03 GMT]]>You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 42 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 89% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223678https://fargostreet.com/post/223678Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:21:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:38:21 GMT]]>You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 41 of the 47 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 87% of the time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223660https://fargostreet.com/post/223660Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:38:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Barack Obama Test on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:20:55 GMT]]>44 out of 47.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/223657https://fargostreet.com/post/223657Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:20:55 GMT