<![CDATA[AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS]]>legacy image

legacy image

its neat.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/15854/ams-twin-sequential-setup....nutsRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 01:26:08 GMTThu, 11 Dec 2008 16:08:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:49 GMT]]>Swt bld.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/239113https://fargostreet.com/post/239113Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:17:06 GMT]]>

Bassplayer;250266 wrote:
pic of the f22?

super street...

has a sick itb setup and header too...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238933https://fargostreet.com/post/238933Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:17:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:00:52 GMT]]>

bubba;249963 wrote:
the motor did win the top shop challenge... iirc it was like 1043hp or something... I still thought Bisimotos all motor engine was sweeter... 350+ hp on a F22 non-vtec and 100 octane..

pic of the f22?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238694https://fargostreet.com/post/238694Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:00:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:15:02 GMT]]>they would have been way better off using a large divided housing with a butterfly valve into the other side. so its only using half the housing at spoolup. works slicker than shit.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238505https://fargostreet.com/post/238505Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:15:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:21:24 GMT]]>the motor did win the top shop challenge... iirc it was like 1043hp or something... I still thought Bisimotos all motor engine was sweeter... 350+ hp on a F22 non-vtec and 100 octane..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238391https://fargostreet.com/post/238391Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:21:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:07:14 GMT]]>

no_slow_clap;249937 wrote:
it never got finished

Sounds about right....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238375https://fargostreet.com/post/238375Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:07:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:15:43 GMT]]>

Slowica;249935 wrote:
hopefully they release vids of it on the strip.

it never got finished

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238365https://fargostreet.com/post/238365Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:15:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:04:09 GMT]]>hopefully they release vids of it on the strip.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238363https://fargostreet.com/post/238363Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:04:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:56:30 GMT]]>^they complicated things just a little. thats alright, you'll never know if something works if you dont ever try it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238362https://fargostreet.com/post/238362Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:56:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:33:58 GMT]]>looks like a overly complicated mix of a compound and seq. system

those guys would be running high pressure ratios on a drag setup........ a straight compound system would have worked perfectly and been 1/3 as complicated

compounds shine at high press. ratios.........seq. FTL all together

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238360https://fargostreet.com/post/238360Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:33:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:13:44 GMT]]>I would be a man and put in a 4th wastegate. Anything less is for babydick wannabes.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238356https://fargostreet.com/post/238356Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:13:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:55:51 GMT]]>they should have set it up with a 3rd wastegate to feed the small turbo from the manifold and left the valves on the big turbo to open based on vacume or a set psi of boost. it would seem to allow some flow through them to get them up to speed.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238355https://fargostreet.com/post/238355Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:55:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:44:22 GMT]]>i see now, i didnt know they were using a valving system on it. it makes more sence. i can see the smaller turbo being a choke point for the bigger if fed other way.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238354https://fargostreet.com/post/238354Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:44:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:39:00 GMT]]>Oh.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238353https://fargostreet.com/post/238353Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:39:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:37:58 GMT]]>

no_slow_clap;249920 wrote:
the exhaust was never entering the small turbo, they couldnt get it to tune right so they just went with the 42.

If you look at the small turbo, there is a turbo flange that comes off of the down pipe of the gt42 to feed the gt28. It does not suprise me that they could not tune it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238352https://fargostreet.com/post/238352Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:37:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:37:37 GMT]]>if you look you can see there is a huge valve on the downpipe of the big turbo, that shuts off the dp. then the smaller turbo is fed from the downpipe when the valve is shut and the big turbo isn't up to speed.

the second valve on the intake of the big turbo looks as if it blocks off the big turbo's inlet to allow the small turbo to spool the big turbo.

see simple... lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238351https://fargostreet.com/post/238351Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:37:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:35:41 GMT]]>

Gundar1;249921 wrote:
thats the motor modified mag had ams build for the top shop challenge thing, they're two different setups.

Not according to AMS.
http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=376412

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238350https://fargostreet.com/post/238350Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:35:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:30:57 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;249916 wrote:
What I was meaning is where is the exhuast enting the turbo? I went and found the pics.

Where did the second turbo go?
legacy image
legacy image

thats the motor modified mag had ams build for the top shop challenge thing, they're two different setups.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238349https://fargostreet.com/post/238349Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:30:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:30:50 GMT]]>the exhaust was never entering the small turbo, they couldnt get it to tune right so they just went with the 42.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238348https://fargostreet.com/post/238348Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:30:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:29:46 GMT]]>Thats sweet, saw that in modified mag last month.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238345https://fargostreet.com/post/238345Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:29:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:28:54 GMT]]>What I was meaning is where is the exhuast enting the turbo? I went and found the pics.

Where did the second turbo go?
legacy image
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238344https://fargostreet.com/post/238344Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:28:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:26:48 GMT]]>Wow that's a fricking puzzle to look at. So how the fuck is the small turbo being powered? my head hurts it's too early haha

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238343https://fargostreet.com/post/238343Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:26:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:21:31 GMT]]>NOTHING!! the small trubo feeds into the dump of the bigger turbo!

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238342https://fargostreet.com/post/238342Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:21:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to AMS twin sequential setup....NUTS on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:12:41 GMT]]>More pics???????????

Whats feeding the tiny turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/238339https://fargostreet.com/post/238339Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:12:41 GMT