<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[America&#x27;s Queen]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13827" rel="nofollow ugc">http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13827</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">First Lady Now Requires 26 Servants</p>
<p dir="auto">“In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much,” she said. “See, that’s why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service,”— Michelle Obama.</p>
<p dir="auto">We were wrong.</p>
<p dir="auto">Michelle Obama, as we reported on July 7, is not served by twenty-two attendants who stand by to cater to her every whim.</p>
<p dir="auto">She is served by twenty-six attendants, including a hair dresser and make-up artist.</p>
<p dir="auto">The annual cost to taxpayers for such unprecedented attention is approximately $1,750,000 without taking into account the expense of the lavish benefit packages afforded to every attendant.</p>
<p dir="auto">Little did American voters realize the call for “change” would result in the establishment of an Obama oligarchy.</p>
<p dir="auto">The discovery of the additional attendants was made by D’Angelo Gore of <a href="http://factcheck.org" rel="nofollow ugc">factcheck.org</a> and by calls to Katie McCormick Lelyyeld, Michelle Obama’s press secretary.</p>
<p dir="auto">Mr. Gore launched his investigation of the First Lady’s staff in the wake of an article that appeared on <a href="http://thelastcrusade.org" rel="nofollow ugc">thelastcrusade.org</a> and Canada Free Press on July 7.</p>
<p dir="auto">The article, which became a chain letter viewed by millions of Americans, reported that Michelle Obama requires more than twenty attendants - - more than any First Lady in U.S. History. It provided the following list of White House staff members assigned to the First Lady:</p>
<p dir="auto">$172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)<br />
$140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)<br />
$113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)<br />
$102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)<br />
$102,000 - Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)<br />
$90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)<br />
$84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)<br />
$75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)<br />
$70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)<br />
$65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)<br />
$65,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)<br />
$62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)<br />
$60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)<br />
$60,000 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)<br />
$52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)<br />
$50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)<br />
$45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)<br />
$45,000 - Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)<br />
$40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)<br />
$36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)<br />
$36,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)<br />
$36,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)<br />
Readers throughout the country expressed outrage that Mrs. Obama would hire an unprecedented number of staffers in the midst of the Great Recession.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The allegations within the July 7 article seemed so outrageous that many readers questioned their accuracy.</p>
<p dir="auto">Does Mrs. Obama have an unprecedented number of staffers in a time when 34 million Americans - - a record number - - rely on food stamps to feed their families?</p>
<p dir="auto">The answer, as D’Angelo Gore of <a href="http://factcheck.org" rel="nofollow ugc">factcheck.org</a> discovered, is yes.</p>
<p dir="auto">When questioned by Mr. Gore, Katie McCormick Lelyveld, Michelle Obama’s press secretary, said that the First Lady does retain a staff of more than twenty who remain at her beck and call. But the actual number is 24, not 22, as the article reported.</p>
<p dir="auto">Mrs. Lelyyeld failed to provide the names of the two additional attendants to Mrs. Obama. But she did confirm that six staffers who do not have “first lady” in their title but are a part of the First Lady’s office staff, such as Desiree Rogers, who bears the title “Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary,” and Natalie Bookey, who is listed as a “staff assistant.”</p>
<p dir="auto">What’s more, even a list of 24 would be incomplete since it would fail to include the names of makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and “First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom travel aboard Air Force One and provide Mrs. Obama with daily attention.</p>
<p dir="auto">This adds up to a whopping $1,600,700.00 and the amount doesn’t include the elite benefit packages granted to the White House staff and their significant others (include same-sex partners). Nor does the figure take into account the salaries for the two additional full-time staff members mentioned by Mrs. Obama’s Press Secretary nor the full time hair-dresser and makeup artist assigned to her. A guesstimate of the total salaries for Mrs. Obama’s attendants is $1,750,00.00 plus the additional benefits.</p>
<p dir="auto">For comparison, let’s remember that poor Bess Truman and Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salaries for 5 of their personal secretaries from their own pocketbooks. Stephen Plotkin, reference archivist for the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, says that Jacqueline Kennedy’s office was “headed” by one person who supervised a staff of approximately nine full and part time workers (including the White House cooks and chambermaids).</p>
<p dir="auto">Kim Coryat, an archives technician at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library, says that it is difficult to nail down a precise count of staff because “White House staffing for all offices ebbs and flows with time.” But she points out that a White House telephone directory indicates that Hillary Clinton had a staff of thirteen in 1993 - - this is telling since Mrs. Clinton intended to serve as a co-executive in the Oval Office by spearheading a health care reform program.</p>
<p dir="auto">Laura Bush was far from a fiscal conservative during her time in the White House and, like her husband, served to bloat the White House budget. A list of Mrs. Bush’s staff attendants is as follows:</p>
<p dir="auto">McBride, Anita B. assistant to the president and chief of staff to the first lady $168,000.00<br />
Harder, Cherie S. Special assistant to the president for domestic policy and director of project of the first lady $108,000.00<br />
Niemiec, Sally M. Press secretary to the First Lady $90,000.00<br />
Miller, Sonja M. Deputy chief of staff to the first lady $84,700.00<br />
Ballard, Deanna M. Director of scheduling for the First Lady $75,000.00<br />
Underwood, Carrie P. Deputy director of policy and projects for the First Lady $65,000.00<br />
Wallace, Charity N. Director of advance for the First Lady $65,000.00<br />
Marshall, Misty C. Director of correspondence for the first lady $59,700.00<br />
Etter, Marisa L. Deputy director of scheduling for the First Lady $50,000.00<br />
King, Kristin N. Deputy director of advance for the first lady $50,000.00<br />
Lineweaver, Lindsey M. Special assistant and personal aide to the first lady $47,500.00<br />
Rawson, Kimberly D. Executive assistant to the chief of staff to the First Lady $46,200.00<br />
Donoghue , Tarah C. Deputy press secretary to the First Lady $43,000.00<br />
Vogel, Campbell B. Deputy director of correspondence for the First Lady $42,500.00<br />
Block, Jonathan F. assistant press secretary to the First Lady $39,000.00<br />
This amounts to a total of $1,083,700.00. Laura was no piker when it came to spending. But she pales in comparison with Miz Michelle, who requires eight to ten additional attendants at an extra cost to taxpayers of $700,000 and change - - the only change American taxpayers can believe in.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Discuss.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/17830/america-s-queen</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:24:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/17830.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:11:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:39:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">YellowEvo;286071 wrote:<br />
LoLuAfAg?!?! ItHiNkSo</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">ItHiNkNoT</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274474</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274474</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:39:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:44:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Link;286067 wrote:<br />
I believe spending 2 million dollars on the first lady would classify under your "random shit". Useless.</p>
<p dir="auto">LoLuMaD?!?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">LoLuAfAg?!?! ItHiNkSo</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274469</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274469</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YellowEvo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:44:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:33:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">T  !  N;286046 wrote:<br />
Dude, I could really give a shit on funding for the first lady.  $2 million dollars is nothing compared to the amount of money the government spends on random shit each year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I believe spending 2 million dollars on the first lady would classify under your "random shit". Useless.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I just get tired of people like 63vette and link posting stupid political shit on this forum.  You can say whatever you want, I don't even know you so I could give two shits for what you have to say.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">LoLuMaD?!?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274465</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274465</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:33:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:43:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">T  !  N;286046 wrote:<br />
Dude, I could really give a shit on funding for the first lady.  $2 million dollars is nothing compared to the amount of money the government spends on random shit each year.  I just get tired of people like 63vette and link posting stupid political shit on this forum.  You can say whatever you want, I don't even know you so I could give two shits for what you have to say.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">haha,  come on man, i am just trying to get you wound up</p>
<p dir="auto">you showed and didn't disappoint</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:43:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:23:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">zbrown;286026 wrote:<br />
Where the hell is Tin, figured he would be in here trying to protect the yard ape's mate</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Dude, I could really give a shit on funding for the first lady.  $2 million dollars is nothing compared to the amount of money the government spends on random shit each year.  I just get tired of people like 63vette and link posting stupid political shit on this forum.  You can say whatever you want, I don't even know you so I could give two shits for what you have to say.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[legacy-user-33]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:23:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:56:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Trafik Jamz;286024 wrote:<br />
Me, I couldn't care less...no matter how hard I tried.<br />
finally, someone else that clarifies this flaw in contemporary american colloquialisms.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[out there]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:56:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:19:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Where the hell is Tin, figured he would be in here trying to protect the yard ape's mate</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274424</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:19:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:12:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Parker;286021 wrote:<br />
i really could care less..... really...</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">How much less could you care?</p>
<p dir="auto">Me, I couldn't care less...no matter how hard I tried.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trafik Jamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:12:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:52:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">DelSlow;285983 wrote:<br />
Hence the use of '~.' Which is the informal way of saying approximately. So I guess it  never was a question of saying 24 is 26...:icon_rabbit:<br />
i really could care less..... really...</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274419</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274419</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:52:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:47:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Link;286010 wrote:<br />
Arrest me now. Please do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">fuckin idiot...</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274409</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274409</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YellowEvo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:47:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:37:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">DelSlow;285999 wrote:<br />
Fargostreet, meet FBI. FBI, meet Fargostreet.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Arrest me now. Please do.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274408</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:37:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:14:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Link;285994 wrote:<br />
Kill the bitch and slowly pay off our national debt?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Fargostreet, meet FBI. FBI, meet Fargostreet.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274397</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274397</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DelSlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:14:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Goodnbuzzd;285990 wrote:<br />
Someone has to take care of the Wookie!   It is freaking ridiculous the amount of money being pissed away to cater to her.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Kill the bitch and slowly pay off our national debt?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274392</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274392</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Link]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:29:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Someone has to take care of the Wookie!   It is freaking ridiculous the amount of money being pissed away to cater to her.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274388</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274388</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodnbuzzd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:29:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:55:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Also, I'm not saying it is justified (it isn't), just pointing out that it isn't 100% unprecedented</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trafik Jamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:55:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:52:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Parker;285980 wrote:<br />
when did 24 become 26?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Hence the use of '~.' Which is the informal way of saying approximately. So I guess it  never was a question of saying 24 is 26...:icon_rabbit:</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DelSlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:52:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:52:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">read the whole article and you will see how some assumptions are being made as to who is/isn't on staff.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trafik Jamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:42:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">when did 24 become 26?</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274378</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274378</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:42:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to America&#x27;s Queen on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:39:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp</a></p>
<p dir="auto">compares Laura Bush and Michelle Obama.  Laura Bush had ~24 on staff according to the site and Michelle Obama has approximately the same amount.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/274376</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/274376</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trafik Jamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:39:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>