<![CDATA[for you eclipse lovers]]>i actually like the new 4g eclipse i think its tight 🙂 here's a commercial

http://www.eclipseforum.com/2006eclipse.wmv

heres a link to find bunches of info on it if interested.... you shouldn't have to log but im not sure..

http://www.eclipseforum.com/forums/index.php?showforum=33

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/2808/for-you-eclipse-loversRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 01:29:19 GMTTue, 24 May 2005 23:20:06 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:54:14 GMT]]>holy thread resurrection Batman. You know, there is a tech section. You may get better results there.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/99821https://fargostreet.com/post/99821Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:54:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:45:36 GMT]]>hey can anybody help me tune up my eclipse. having some troubles, if anybody can hook me me up give me a shout.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/99820https://fargostreet.com/post/99820Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:45:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:53:57 GMT]]>

g35girl wrote:
because 3g's are newer and more expensive, and like CCr said in the "i need a paint color plz" thread, most of the ppl on this site are broke 🙂 and besides, ive seen more 2gs not running and have more things go wrong with them then 3g's ever had......

my car is worth more than most 3'gs........

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54035https://fargostreet.com/post/54035Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:53:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:23:01 GMT]]>

g35girl wrote:
because 3g's are newer and more expensive, and like CCr said in the "i need a paint color plz" thread, most of the ppl on this site are broke 🙂 and besides, ive seen more 2gs not running and have more things go wrong with them then 3g's ever had......

Sorry but no. 3G's are not baller cars, in fact, many 2G's sell for quite a bit more then 3g's.

Off the top of my head, I can only think of about three 2g's: mine, troy's and brians.

I guarentee that we have more money in to mods then nearly any 3G is worth...

Fact of the matter is, 2G's go fast, they look sexy as hell, and parts are readily available to modify them.

If you had some old man driving them, they'd never break, but of course, if your car is fast, you get on the gas, and stuff breaks when you actually make real power.

3G's would break more then 2G's, if they actually had some get up and go, and, while on that subject, if they had the same amount of wear and tear (miles and years) as 2G's now do... Actually now that I think about it, 3G's have tons of problems and they aren't even old yet...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53990https://fargostreet.com/post/53990Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:23:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:26:56 GMT]]>the reason 2gs are broken so much is because people beat the shit out of them all the time because they are more of a true sports car. in my own personal opinion, a 210hp v6 n/a motor in a fwd boat of a car (c'mon.. 3gs are bigger than my oldsmobile was) is much less of a sports car than a 210hp 4cyl turbo in an awd car.

but anyway, if youd read the title of the poll, this is about what you think looks better. it doesnt say 'what car can you afford?' or 'what car runs better?'

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53985https://fargostreet.com/post/53985Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:26:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:54:19 GMT]]>Well 3g's dont have the infamous 4g63T....so that MIGHT be why..but thats just me 😛

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53982https://fargostreet.com/post/53982Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:54:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:44:19 GMT]]>

treimche wrote:
And why do you suppose that is?

because 3g's are newer and more expensive, and like CCr said in the "i need a paint color plz" thread, most of the ppl on this site are broke 🙂 and besides, ive seen more 2gs not running and have more things go wrong with them then 3g's ever had......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53971https://fargostreet.com/post/53971Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:44:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:47:39 GMT]]>

LT1 wrote:
yea thast cuz
2g owners = 100
3g owners = 3

And why do you suppose that is?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53871https://fargostreet.com/post/53871Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:47:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 06:54:30 GMT]]>yea thast cuz
2g owners = 100
3g owners = 3

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53387https://fargostreet.com/post/53387Fri, 17 Jun 2005 06:54:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:45:10 GMT]]>2g's own

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53370https://fargostreet.com/post/53370Fri, 17 Jun 2005 05:45:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:40:42 GMT]]>The polls dont lie.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53353https://fargostreet.com/post/53353Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:40:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:07:31 GMT]]>damn, 3g's are definately making a strong fight for the win in this poll

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/53341https://fargostreet.com/post/53341Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:07:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:48:19 GMT]]>hell i wouldnt mind an awd version of the v6 either...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52817https://fargostreet.com/post/52817Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:48:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:12:56 GMT]]>It would be really cool to see them bring back the awd turbo eclipse...especially in that new body style! I would definetly put down money for something like that in a hurry....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52813https://fargostreet.com/post/52813Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:12:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:09:17 GMT]]>

weshole wrote:
You haven't lived 'till you've owned a 1G fwd 1.8 n/a.

I'm sure....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52786https://fargostreet.com/post/52786Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:09:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:14:26 GMT]]>You haven't lived 'till you've owned a 1G fwd 1.8 n/a.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52498https://fargostreet.com/post/52498Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:14:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:12:47 GMT]]>

YellowEvo wrote:
i would rather own a 2g than a 3g but i like both... i am partial to AWD Turbo... 😄

ditto.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52496https://fargostreet.com/post/52496Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:12:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:02:10 GMT]]>i would rather own a 2g than a 3g but i like both... i am partial to AWD Turbo... 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52493https://fargostreet.com/post/52493Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:02:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:02:01 GMT]]>lol, true... damn beer goggles!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52491https://fargostreet.com/post/52491Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:02:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:59:52 GMT]]>and fat chicks still get lovein....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52489https://fargostreet.com/post/52489Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:59:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:38:44 GMT]]>

99slowGSX wrote:
Haha owned......

agreed

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52465https://fargostreet.com/post/52465Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:38:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:49:01 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
thats like saying...

skinny chicks... fat chicks... big deal?? oh wait..... fat chicks don't look better with make up on!

Same thing with 3G's you can put all the make up you want on them, and they are still fugly

Haha owned......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52460https://fargostreet.com/post/52460Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:49:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to for you eclipse lovers on Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:43:33 GMT]]>

g35girl wrote:
Slow...fast....BIG HAIRY DEAL....all that does is cause you to lose your license.....and besides, 3g's look much better tricked out 😛

thats like saying...

skinny chicks... fat chicks... big deal?? oh wait..... fat chicks don't look better with make up on!

Same thing with 3G's you can put all the make up you want on them, and they are still fugly

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/52458https://fargostreet.com/post/52458Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:43:33 GMT