<![CDATA[New Turbo...]]>Well, my T04B decided to take a shit, so I guess its time to go bigger: Holset HX-35.... used on Dodge Cummins Diesel trucks!

legacy image

legacy image

And a picture of a 14b (what I had last year) and the new turbo (Not the exact one, but close):

14BvsHolset.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/3143/new-turbo...RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 17:12:11 GMTFri, 24 Jun 2005 18:49:32 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:26:39 GMT]]>

PSI2HI wrote:
Spool up rpm claims are a waste of time. They are never accurate and vary so drastically from setup to setup.
my comment about 3800-4000 is what the majority of people on other boards with 2L (dsm and wrx) are claiming. also interesting, is that 2.1-2.4 guys aren't spinning it up much faster, i think the lowest i've read is about 22psi by 3500ish.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54848https://fargostreet.com/post/54848Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:26:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:03:37 GMT]]>What he's saying is that, if you care about spooling up quickly, don't buy a big turbo. The stuff that makes you go fast, top end power, is what big turbos are good for.

14b's are quick, but not fast without EVERYTHING else being top notch. A big turbo + the same top notch = always faster...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54847https://fargostreet.com/post/54847Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:03:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:53:53 GMT]]>

PSI2HI wrote:
Spool up rpm claims are a waste of time. They are never accurate and vary so drastically from setup to setup. If your worried about spool up keep the 14b.
If there are people with 14b's faster than those with large turbo's then why even upgrade at all?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54846https://fargostreet.com/post/54846Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:53:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:12:46 GMT]]>everyone knows everything.
92TSIpos

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54845https://fargostreet.com/post/54845Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:12:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:31:38 GMT]]>Spoolup is over rated.

😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54817https://fargostreet.com/post/54817Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:31:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:37:25 GMT]]>Spool up rpm claims are a waste of time. They are never accurate and vary so drastically from setup to setup. If your worried about spool up keep the 14b.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54796https://fargostreet.com/post/54796Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:37:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:30:12 GMT]]>I don't think people should comment on big turbos when they haven't had anything bigger than a 14b;) I ran a 38mm gate on my car and it was fine down to 15 psi, never tried anything lower than that. I am pretty sure my turbo was bigger than this one, or close in size. It was at 35psi most of the time though:) Will be interesting to see this turbo run, that is if Jim ever gets his car going!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54794https://fargostreet.com/post/54794Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:30:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:24:38 GMT]]>boost creep is still possible, that's why he would need a very large wastegate to run a lower psi, but running +/-30psi wouldn't require a very large one.
i don't know what some of you guys are babbling about with it taking forever to spool, it does have full spool (to low 20s) by 3800-4000

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54726https://fargostreet.com/post/54726Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:24:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:01:44 GMT]]>if he dumps it wont bust creep and what not...no kaboom

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54722https://fargostreet.com/post/54722Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:01:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:36:05 GMT]]>I bet 44mm, and what difference does it make if he runs recirculated or atmospheric? No power gains.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54717https://fargostreet.com/post/54717Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:36:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:14:21 GMT]]>going for 500hp on pump gas? what kind of wastegate will you be running? 40mm? 44? atmospheric dump or plumbed back into the main exhaust?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54696https://fargostreet.com/post/54696Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:14:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:27:40 GMT]]>Trying to catch Dave?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54694https://fargostreet.com/post/54694Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:27:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:54:39 GMT]]>cant wait to see it on the street again 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54693https://fargostreet.com/post/54693Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:54:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:08 GMT]]>Definitely wont spool as fast as the 14b but will make way more power.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54581https://fargostreet.com/post/54581Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:26:02 GMT]]>ya i didnt order it with internal gate

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54559https://fargostreet.com/post/54559Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:26:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:59:37 GMT]]>

PSI2HI wrote:
Ditch the internal gate.

I second that... especially on a turbo of that size.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54519https://fargostreet.com/post/54519Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:59:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:49:44 GMT]]>Ditch the internal gate.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54516https://fargostreet.com/post/54516Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:49:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:07:22 GMT]]>just getting closer and closer to worlds fastest spyder....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54502https://fargostreet.com/post/54502Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:07:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:57:21 GMT]]>no. boost somewhere in the 4000 range

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54500https://fargostreet.com/post/54500Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:57:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:46:04 GMT]]>that's big, are you going to be able to spool it with out alot of lag?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54496https://fargostreet.com/post/54496Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:46:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:51:09 GMT]]>Holy shit..I remember seeing one of those in auto class two years ago.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54484https://fargostreet.com/post/54484Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:51:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:43:28 GMT]]>what is the A/R on that?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54483https://fargostreet.com/post/54483Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:43:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:43:39 GMT]]>your car sounds bad-ass

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54476https://fargostreet.com/post/54476Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:43:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Turbo... on Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:19:29 GMT]]>I'm lookin at one of those right now, but its a bad one. we had to change it out for a new one on a truck it was leaking lots of oil

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/54471https://fargostreet.com/post/54471Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:19:29 GMT