<![CDATA[Whats Up]]>im from egf and im new to your forum so ill tell you i got a 1993 ford probe gt all stock right now but i got some plans

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/3340/whats-upRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 19:45:15 GMTWed, 13 Jul 2005 05:44:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:33:39 GMT]]>how you post pics

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57635https://fargostreet.com/post/57635Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:33:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:32:50 GMT]]>ya i wasnt really thinkin many engine mods yet if at all just a cold air intake maybe but it needs paint and probly rims tires lower tint that what im hopin for right now

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57634https://fargostreet.com/post/57634Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:32:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:34:27 GMT]]>Stock vs. stock, the 89-92 and 93-97 Probe GT were close in 1/4 mile performance. The acceptable factory-trim E.T.s are 15.4-5 for the 1st-gen and 15.6-8 for the 2nd-gen. With so many GTs with questionable maintenance histories and variances in driver ability, at the track it's anyone's guess which generation would be faster. Assuming engine modifications are in place, the 1st-gen GT should see 14's easily. However, it's not been very common over the past 6 years I've been in the Probe scene for 1st-gens to break 14.0 seconds. The F2T is not a heavy breather. The nod goes to the much more technologically advanced 2.5 V6 KLDE engine for that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57606https://fargostreet.com/post/57606Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:34:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:38:23 GMT]]>

lord_deastofact wrote:
I have to say out of the probes I think the 89-90 models are the nicer looking and alittle quicker too I think. but welcome to the forum.
A lot quicker and look a lot nice.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57596https://fargostreet.com/post/57596Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:38:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:00:14 GMT]]>I have to say out of the probes I think the 89-90 models are the nicer looking and alittle quicker too I think. but welcome to the forum.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57586https://fargostreet.com/post/57586Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:00:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:13:48 GMT]]>

wannabe wrote:
Are you serious?
Yeah I am serious they were on my cars to consider list for a while before the EX.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57574https://fargostreet.com/post/57574Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:13:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:57:08 GMT]]>

Bad93ex wrote:
I think 2G PGT's look great
Are you serious?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57520https://fargostreet.com/post/57520Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:57:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:12:19 GMT]]>Welcome to the site

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57512https://fargostreet.com/post/57512Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:12:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Whats Up on Wed, 13 Jul 2005 05:47:12 GMT]]>I think 2G PGT's look great but their reliability rivals that of a DSM. Good luck with your plans.

Oh and some pics would be nice.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/57480https://fargostreet.com/post/57480Wed, 13 Jul 2005 05:47:12 GMT