<![CDATA[New Toys (ITB's)]]>Here are my new toys. they wont be going on until i get a good enginemanagement system tho. I think i am also going to have the plenums redone so they are straight since the ports for the ITB's match the ports on the stock intake mani. Here are the pics.

Oh and they are GSXR Throttle bodies attached to a cut stock IM.

DSC00673.JPG
DSC00672.JPG
DSC00671.JPG
DSC00670.JPG

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4297/new-toys-itb-sRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 23:31:49 GMTTue, 04 Oct 2005 20:30:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:56:20 GMT]]>Wont be on til next summer guys due to tuning issues i would have. and i would also want to dyno tune it once i get a good EMS.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73497https://fargostreet.com/post/73497Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:56:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:47:03 GMT]]>put thos on and race me!!! sohc vs sohc

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73425https://fargostreet.com/post/73425Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:47:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:18:56 GMT]]>They're from a Suzuki GSX-R motorcycle. http://www.homemadeturbo.com/tech_projects/itb/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73271https://fargostreet.com/post/73271Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:18:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:25:58 GMT]]>what brand are they? i'm guessing not toda.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73264https://fargostreet.com/post/73264Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:25:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:13:28 GMT]]>^^^ nice try but now they wont.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73098https://fargostreet.com/post/73098Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:13:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:21:52 GMT]]>It's ok, they will be for sale in a week when he wants a new project anyways! 😛

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73077https://fargostreet.com/post/73077Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:21:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:27:43 GMT]]>oh, and i forgot to mention that when they were on groshongs hatch they run fine untuned, they just idled choppy but at WOT they were fine.

oh and ITB's are harder to tune due to the fact that they all need to be adjusted individually also just like a carb.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73057https://fargostreet.com/post/73057Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:27:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:02:57 GMT]]>

harwood39 wrote:
so now why does every one think im in over my head? The hardest part will be tuning.

This is true....but the hardest part is always tuning....ITB's (I'd imagine, don't know for sure) almost have to be harder to tune than a single TB. Just my thoughts.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73055https://fargostreet.com/post/73055Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:02:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:00:59 GMT]]>so now why does every one think im in over my head? The hardest part will be tuning.

oh ya, and im not doing this because i am maxing out my stock intake mani, im doing it for the throttle response and HP numbers.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/73054https://fargostreet.com/post/73054Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:00:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:07:14 GMT]]>Im doing a lot of airflow testing right now w/ Z6 and Y8 heads an intake manifolds as im working on building sheetmetal intake and doing some head work on them. The stock Y8 intake manifold will flow enough cfm to not start choking down the power until 7500 rpm(based off a 250hp car). Based on those #'s alone there's no way your maxing out airflow of the stock intake running a stock compression/cam SOHC, let alone reving to the stock limiter.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72996https://fargostreet.com/post/72996Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:07:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:37:12 GMT]]>This is prolly a good example why it is easier to go boosted.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72980https://fargostreet.com/post/72980Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:37:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:22:31 GMT]]>"hail to the sled god" er i mean, d series god(if thats a title worth mentioning)haha jk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72963https://fargostreet.com/post/72963Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:22:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:16:44 GMT]]>

harwood39 wrote:
If you just bypass it and use tps based tables, you have really bad gas milage for daily driving.

That is why you tune your maps. If you tune them to 14.7 low load through 13.2 heavy load your gas mileage won't change.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72931https://fargostreet.com/post/72931Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:16:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:56:37 GMT]]>good luck ya big pimp you.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72928https://fargostreet.com/post/72928Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:56:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:46:44 GMT]]>[QUOTE=harwood39]its not due to the o2 sensor, its because you have to bypass the map and use a TPS based fuel map. ITB's have a lot less vacuum below 5k than plenum style manifolds have so the map doesnt read sufficeint vacuum compared to what other sensors say and it picks wrong fuel tables. If you just bypass it and use tps based tables, you have really bad gas milage for dailiy driving[/QUOTE=harwood39] last time i checked ITB's aren't made for daily driven use. but if you plan on doing it... swap your ecu's, and run something that works for daily driving. and then buy another ecu with crome or uber data on it.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72927https://fargostreet.com/post/72927Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:46:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:20:59 GMT]]>its not due to the o2 sensor, its because you have to bypass the map and use a TPS based fuel map. ITB's have a lot less vacuum below 5k than plenum style manifolds have so the map doesnt read sufficeint vacuum compared to what other sensors say and it picks wrong fuel tables. If you just bypass it and use tps based tables, you have really bad gas milage for daily driving.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72922https://fargostreet.com/post/72922Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:20:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:15:42 GMT]]>Kill off your O2 sensors and you won't have any problems using crome or uberdata below 5500 RPMs for what you need to do. Who told you that you would?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72919https://fargostreet.com/post/72919Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:15:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:12:16 GMT]]>I did my homework and i also have a Honda-tuning article where they made these exactly how these ones are and all they did was bolt them on and tune it with a VAFC and got a gain of 21.3 WHP. I have been researching these since i saw the article and have many threads saved about them. Its fairly simple besides tuning. I am not installing these until i get an EMS. I am hopefully going to save up for AEM and if not, hondata. I cant just use chrome or uberdata due to lower rpm tuning problems(sub 5500). Here are a few sites:

http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1098708
http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1148512
http://sohchonda.com/v-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2878
http://www.d-series.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2957

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72918https://fargostreet.com/post/72918Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:12:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:00:38 GMT]]>groshogn obviously didnt want em, so u better make good use of em. also, u need some velocity stacks. and get rid of the hose clamps/couplers....i smell vacuum leaks

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72915https://fargostreet.com/post/72915Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:00:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New Toys (ITB's) on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:57:57 GMT]]>You just jumped in way over your head as far as whats going to be all in making these work. What exactly are you trying to gain here especially w/ a stock motor SOHC?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/72914https://fargostreet.com/post/72914Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:57:57 GMT