<![CDATA[SRT4 vs Tiburon]]>This is a nice little racing/tiburon owning video for all you hatas out there. Enjoy.

http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/wNTU1MTQxNnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D

Not sure if that link is what it should be, se here is the thread link.

http://racingsouthwest.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=9210

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/444/srt4-vs-tiburonRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 12:41:40 GMTMon, 20 Sep 2004 02:32:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:06:27 GMT]]>traction control is a term reserved for those, and only those, with ricer listed as a member status..you are not allowed to straddle the line so plese move either to your left or right...thank you.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6050https://fargostreet.com/post/6050Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:06:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:40:29 GMT]]>aah oops maybe i shouldve actually read all of it i just seen TC and figured they were talking about traction control

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6038https://fargostreet.com/post/6038Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:40:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:24:10 GMT]]>when they were referring to "TC" above, they meant Torque Converter, not traction control...just to clarify

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6037https://fargostreet.com/post/6037Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:24:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:07:00 GMT]]>i'd have to say traction control is pretty worthless is some vehichles...i drove a z06 and had TC on and i could still burn the tires good!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6034https://fargostreet.com/post/6034Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:07:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:30:03 GMT]]>Let me tell you. It sucks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6030https://fargostreet.com/post/6030Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:30:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:55:48 GMT]]>

92BlackTT wrote:
gravedigger how do you plan on eliminating traction problems by installing a level 10 TC???????? i wish you well on the little double digit psi advanture you are about to embark on as well
Good point, I have trouble w/ traction being AWD and around 300 WHP, can't imagine what you FWDer's are going thru.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6029https://fargostreet.com/post/6029Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:55:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:36:45 GMT]]>gravedigger how do you plan on eliminating traction problems by installing a level 10 TC???????? i wish you well on the little double digit psi advanture you are about to embark on as well

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6026https://fargostreet.com/post/6026Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:36:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:00:38 GMT]]>from what I have heard, you want to lock up after you are done shifting gears, otherwise (I would imagine) it could be very hard on the transmission

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6019https://fargostreet.com/post/6019Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:00:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:20:21 GMT]]>I always wanted do a TC lockup mod on my old Z24 and everyone laughed at me. Said it wouldn't do anything. I always thought it would work nicely.

Anyway, what are the dangers in doing it? I imagine shifts become pretty hard.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6015https://fargostreet.com/post/6015Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:20:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:41:27 GMT]]>Thats (paddle shifter) on my list after/when I get my valvebody done...that and TC lockup mod, should help eliminate some of the losses normally associated w/ autos.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6009https://fargostreet.com/post/6009Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:41:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:30:19 GMT]]>Too bad they still suffer from larger power losses than MTX cars. I want paddle shift personally 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6007https://fargostreet.com/post/6007Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:30:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:52:44 GMT]]>No doubt.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6006https://fargostreet.com/post/6006Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:52:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:33:21 GMT]]>I support shiftronic its kinda like a quick shift my dads drag car. I would still rather have manual but it is better then full auto.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/6001https://fargostreet.com/post/6001Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:33:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:39:24 GMT]]>shiftronic sucks ass

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5966https://fargostreet.com/post/5966Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:39:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:35:28 GMT]]>i can do it with any of mine too...it shifts more firmly when you shift yourself which is better for an auto underload

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5957https://fargostreet.com/post/5957Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:35:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:31:53 GMT]]>I wasn't directing that all at you, but a lot of people mock my shiftronic auto. Everyone can shift, but that's gay, the whole, 1-2-D or whatever there car is. I hear that's also really hard on the tranny, where mine is not. I can hold higher RPM's easier and smoother. Usually they only have like 1st and 2nd gear, I can do it with any of them.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5956https://fargostreet.com/post/5956Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:31:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:23:40 GMT]]>

GraveDigger wrote:
Yeah, let's keep mocking my shiftronic.....pwned
what are you talkin about? i wasnt mocking anything...i was simply stating that he started in a higher gear...pretty much every auto you can select the gear your in and shift when you want...and i dont really see how i was pwned or owned...either way

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5954https://fargostreet.com/post/5954Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:23:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:58:06 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
All utecs (v 3.1 and higher) came standard w/ launch control from the factory. Many of the guys utilizing it where experiencing problems w/ their cars after using it so I think that may be the reason that he's not.

Bingo 🙂 as for me not racing. Too many horror stories of people from Muscatell Subaru being at the tracks and denying warranty if they see you there. Considering my piston rings just got warranties I'm thankful I didn't as the labor cost would've been tremendous. I don't want to do aftermarket internals either since I am selling the car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5948https://fargostreet.com/post/5948Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:58:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:46:00 GMT]]>

2wheeler wrote:
Why have a 2 step if you don't race?
All utecs (v 3.1 and higher) came standard w/ launch control from the factory. Many of the guys utilizing it where experiencing problems w/ their cars after using it so I think that may be the reason that he's not.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5946https://fargostreet.com/post/5946Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:46:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:31:42 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
the reason it wasnt close from a roll is that you started in a different gear than him...

Yeah, let's keep mocking my shiftronic.....pwned

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5944https://fargostreet.com/post/5944Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:31:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:56:11 GMT]]>

2k3WRXND wrote:
I have a stutter box 🙂

Why have a 2 step if you don't race?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5943https://fargostreet.com/post/5943Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:56:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:57:22 GMT]]>

GraveDigger wrote:
TIN and PSIed said that your car was slower than tins, and I am not just saying that, they said you ran like a harwood style 16.5+ or something at the track, higher than that I think. Let's just say, I slaughtered TIN from a roll, and it was pretty close from a dig. He told me not to tell anyone the outcome. Nah, it was close. I pretty much had him for a while, then he pulled later, but I would hope so, having 30 more hp than me from the factory. It was serioulsy not even close from a roll, but I suppose you guys are heavier and all. I am sure I will race you some day here and stop all of this nonsense, but not now, after what just happened, and having to pay $89 to nissan today, I am taking it easy.
the reason it wasnt close from a roll is that you started in a different gear than him...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5938https://fargostreet.com/post/5938Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:57:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:06:48 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
yes, dynoed about 2 months ago. 283 WHP and 296 Torque. all this was @ 16.5 psi in a 94 degree shop on 92 octane. I'm still not fully tuned for racing, this was just to get my car running, not a performance tune at all. TXS is getting almost 100 WHP more than I am out of my setup...and running 11's. No worries though, I'll make the trip to Godspeed for the ultimate tune sometime this winter to get tuned by God himself... I should see low 12's high 11's by the end of next year HOPEFULLY.

amazed that you arent actually. I'll see you at the track in my Solara 🙂

P.S - No performance mods to the solara so dont think I'm doing anything to it. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5933https://fargostreet.com/post/5933Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:06:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to SRT4 vs Tiburon on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:19:10 GMT]]>yes, dynoed about 2 months ago. 283 WHP and 296 Torque. all this was @ 16.5 psi in a 94 degree shop on 92 octane. I'm still not fully tuned for racing, this was just to get my car running, not a performance tune at all. TXS is getting almost 100 WHP more than I am out of my setup...and running 11's. No worries though, I'll make the trip to Godspeed for the ultimate tune sometime this winter to get tuned by God himself... I should see low 12's high 11's by the end of next year HOPEFULLY.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/5930https://fargostreet.com/post/5930Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:19:10 GMT