<![CDATA[Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok**]]>Nissan has stated that the new USDM Nissan GT-R (skyline) will NOT be the infinity G35. These are the actual pics from the unveiling of the Nissan GT-R. It is about 80% done. The rumor is that it will be priced slightly lower than the fully loaded 350Z, somehow I feel the rumor is wrong. 🙂

legacy image
legacy image
legacy image legacy image
legacy image

More here (computer animated).

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/4513/nissan-gt-r-concept.-56k-should-be-okRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 19:38:34 GMTThu, 20 Oct 2005 15:13:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:23:01 GMT]]>to me the front end looks like a cross between a cadillac and a z. backend is sweet though. i suppose with 450 stock hp i wouldnt really care what it looked like.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76993https://fargostreet.com/post/76993Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:23:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:14:22 GMT]]>All I wanna hear is actual dates and pricing on this "skyline" or whatever they do to it instead of all this gossip. Want some actual good stuff to hear.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76990https://fargostreet.com/post/76990Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:14:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:20:52 GMT]]>I don't like the front end, everything else is awesome. The front makes it look too much like a 350z, which I think are ugly.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76306https://fargostreet.com/post/76306Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:20:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:45:13 GMT]]>x4, There just going to flat out loose there appeal after they come to the u.s. A perfect example is the STi...When I saw an STi for the first time a few years back (a pretty modified one at that)...All that came out of my mouth was "dammnn"

But now they are everywhere and its almost annoying seeing them so much...but thats In my own opinion!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76303https://fargostreet.com/post/76303Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:45:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:17:34 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
idk this might sound sad/weird to some people but im definately over the skyline shock...idk

x3, back about 5 years ago i was all about the skyline, but now im just like ...........meh

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76302https://fargostreet.com/post/76302Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:17:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:29:27 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
idk this might sound sad/weird to some people but im definately over the skyline shock...idk

x2. I'll freak out when I see a modded GTR-34 in Fargo.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76275https://fargostreet.com/post/76275Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:29:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:44:35 GMT]]>

burnteclipse wrote:
you just lost at least 2 cool points.........anyway bet that the first one in fargo everyone will be like SWEET did you see the skyline??

idk this might sound sad/weird to some people but im definately over the skyline shock...idk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76269https://fargostreet.com/post/76269Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:44:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:45:30 GMT]]>that thing is fucking MEAN.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76249https://fargostreet.com/post/76249Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:45:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:38:47 GMT]]>you just lost at least 2 cool points.........anyway bet that the first one in fargo everyone will be like SWEET did you see the skyline??

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76244https://fargostreet.com/post/76244Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:38:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:35:41 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
Same article, a rep from Nissan guaranteed that it won't be a V8

I was kinda hoping it would be 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76216https://fargostreet.com/post/76216Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:35:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:40:26 GMT]]>Same article, a rep from Nissan guaranteed that it won't be a V8

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76144https://fargostreet.com/post/76144Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:40:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:39:57 GMT]]>According to Superstreet (I think....I'll double check some other time) it will be a twin turbo VQ30DETT AWD (optional). And while it shares in some ways the look of a 350z, nearly everything else will be different.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76142https://fargostreet.com/post/76142Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:39:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:29:48 GMT]]>That car looks like a normal skyline on some really fucked up government steroid project or some shit.

Kinda scary, and if it does come to us with 450hp... I dont see it being under $40,000.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76110https://fargostreet.com/post/76110Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:29:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:52:36 GMT]]>

itdrags wrote:
that car is ugly as f0ck

Agreed, this coming from a Nissan whore.

It's as if they took the things that symbolized the GT-R (badging, donut taillights, blacked out headlights) and stuck them on a 350Z.

Typical platform sharing BS. It better have one balls to the walls awesome motor, and it better be factory turbocharged, or it will be a disgrace to the GT-R namesake in my books.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76105https://fargostreet.com/post/76105Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:52:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:42:09 GMT]]>that car is ugly as f0ck

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76104https://fargostreet.com/post/76104Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:42:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:06:49 GMT]]>i like how they stuck with the old looking ass end with the tail lights....heard something they were thinking about bringing back the supra???anyone else hear this....good to see that they might acutally be making a turn back towards high performance imports....ill start saving now....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76089https://fargostreet.com/post/76089Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:06:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:38:34 GMT]]>Update, 7 speed sequential gearbox
AWD

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76079https://fargostreet.com/post/76079Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:38:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:17:22 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
i didnt hear it was a VQ37 i heard it was a VQ30DETT that is used in their motorsports platform GTR and 350Z...but there is talk that the US will get a V8...

so the U.S. would get fucked anyways...typical...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76042https://fargostreet.com/post/76042Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:17:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:32:13 GMT]]>i didnt hear it was a VQ37 i heard it was a VQ30DETT that is used in their motorsports platform GTR and 350Z...but there is talk that the US will get a V8...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/76015https://fargostreet.com/post/76015Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:32:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:37:03 GMT]]>Sexy car, can't imagine how that can be priced lower than a fully loaded 350z....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75999https://fargostreet.com/post/75999Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:37:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:30:00 GMT]]>

sUpRaHoLiC wrote:
All that shiny black stuff on the front is carbon fiber and there are openings in it, its just a litttle dark to see them.

Just what I was going to say. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75997https://fargostreet.com/post/75997Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:30:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:49:24 GMT]]>All that shiny black stuff on the front is carbon fiber and there are openings in it, its just a litttle dark to see them. If it has 450hp i'd hit it :eek: , i mean check it out 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75991https://fargostreet.com/post/75991Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:49:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:22:02 GMT]]>The glass shit on front is gay...

How are the radiator / intercooler going to get flow

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75983https://fargostreet.com/post/75983Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:22:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nissan GT-R concept. **56k, should be ok** on Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:46:33 GMT]]>Sexy...I like it

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/75974https://fargostreet.com/post/75974Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:46:33 GMT