Honda = Slow
-
MisterCMK;166437 wrote:
Eh, Mustangs are slow too.Any Mustang II or 96-98 Mustang is proof of that.
-
PineInchNenis69;166454 wrote:
Any Mustang II or 96-98 Mustang is proof of that.Yup.
Rick is going to do the cam/intake swap this year. It turns out that the previous owner of his car swapped the plastic crossover intake for a metal one. Where can I find the part number to check if it is a PI intake?
-
It's not PI, I already checked. It's too shallow in the cylinder valley. You could have him check it again I guess...if the bottom of the manifold is like 1" or less from the top of the valley then it's PI, otherwise it's NPI.
-
This post is deleted!
-
^^^ Im with methodless on this one.
They may be slow, but they are hella reliable and get great gas milage. Which is better than just being slow, unreliable, and getting bad gas milage, like mustangs for example.
-
SmitEvo;166528 wrote:
Agressive cams> vtech anyday..........:)I may someday get a Hunduh as a daily driver.....but I will tell you this, I will never drive a Mustang.
brians day of owning a honda will come!!!! buuuahahahahah...i like how since i dont say vtak anymore that everybody else does...weird how things come full circle...:icon_scratch::icon_colors:
-
torbs;166532 wrote:
brians day of owning a honda will come!!!! buuuahahahahah...i like how since i dont say vtak anymore that everybody else does...weird how things come full circle...:icon_scratch::icon_colors:Everyone else knows when to shut the fuck up and you don't.
-
inspector01;166526 wrote:
slow, unreliable, and getting bad gas milage, like mustangs for example.While mustangs may be slow stock they are still faster than a stock Honda, will last 200K+ miles, and get ~20mpg.
-
PineInchNenis69;166537 wrote:
While mustangs may be slow stock they are still faster than a stock Honda, will last 200K+ miles, and get ~20mpg.Find me a mustang that is running on almost all original drivetrain parts (original motor and tranny for that exact car) and i will find you 10x as many hondas with that milage on the original motor and tranny. And wow, 20 mpg, impressive.
-
HandoEX;166540 wrote:
There are stock Honda's that are faster than stock Mustangs.
Yeah I suppose that statement could turn into a "this models faster than that model" debate. OVERALL I think my statement is true.inspector01;166541 wrote:
Find me a mustang that is running on almost all original drivetrain parts (original motor and tranny for that exact car) and i will find you 10x as many hondas with that milage on the original motor and tranny. And wow, 20 mpg, impressive.That's because there are 10x as many Hondas driving around. Either way I'm done turning the thread into a pissing match because you're never going to appreciate a Mustang and I'm never going to give a damn about a Honda.
-
PineInchNenis69;166544 wrote:
Yeah I suppose that statement could turn into a "this models faster than that model" debate. OVERALL I think my statement is true.That's because there are 10x as many Hondas driving around. Either way I'm done turning the thread into a pissing match because you're never going to appreciate a Mustang and I'm never going to give a damn about a Honda.
Hondas are better.
-
HandoEX;166547 wrote:
Hondas are better.Grocery getters...:p:
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login