Evo Crashers New Pics.

[capitlj]

DrifterExtreme;244800 wrote:
looking good, wingless FTMFW!!!!

QFT!!!!

[Bassplayer]

Your calipers look a little faded.....:icon_puke_r:

[Rexwagon]

about time.

[ihaveaids]

Zac, looks like you next mod needs to be a camera lol.

[KA-T_240]

ihaveaids;244847 wrote:
Zac, looks like you next mod needs to be a camera lol.

That would be a waste of his money.

You can take good pics with a P&S but you need to know how to properly use a camera. Having a SLR camera does not mean you are going to get BA pics.

[Slowica]

You need mo boost.... and then maybe a new motor lol. lookin good though :icon_thumleft:

[Parker]

looks like an evo....

[Factory Freak]

looks good.

[civic91]

looks weird without the wing.

[no_slow_clap]

DrifterExtreme;244800 wrote:
looking good, wingless FTMFW!!!!

what all is done to the car so far?

well the rebuilt trans, act clutch and fly wheel...(i do NOT recomend this clutch to any evo owner, good if your satisifed with about 400ish at the wheels, and if you love 4th gear lock out) i will be getting an exedy twin disk soon.

other than that..
SlowBoy Racing front mount + licp. im still waiting on my upper ic pipe
turbo XS down pipe
HI-flow cat....junk :icon_puke_r:
apexi catback
tanabe GF210 springs
the rpf1's

i have my hallman pro RX boost controller on the way.
so i need a fuel pump then i can start logging/flashing.

King Ricer;244808 wrote:
is it fast yet???

nope

Bassplayer;244827 wrote:
Your calipers look a little faded.....:icon_puke_r:

everybodies doing it. but yea, i need other work done first so faded calipers arent on my high priority.

KA-T_240;244868 wrote:
That would be a waste of his money.

You can take good pics with a P&S but you need to know how to properly use a camera. Having a SLR camera does not mean you are going to get BA pics.

yes i know, my digicam skill are weak. i must learn the force of the cam before i can used it.

[no_slow_clap]

civic91;244885 wrote:
looks weird without the wing.

looks better when i can see outta my back window.

the federalis hide like wildcats, the pounce unexpectadly.

[Rexwagon]

I think you should put the wing back on. It may keep you from going sidewayz. There is downforce from it for a reason.

[civic91]

no_slow_clap;244887 wrote:
looks better when i can see outta my back window.

never thought about that, i always thought it was big enough to see through.

[capitlj]

Looks a lot better without the wing. Its not a race car its an EVO, if it becomes a race car then put the picnic table back on.

EVO that doesn't look like a shopping cart FTW!!!

[gsrEK]

wingless < wing

[no_slow_clap]

Rexwagon;244898 wrote:
I think you should put the wing back on. It may keep you from going sidewayz. There is downforce from it for a reason.

the "down force" a stock evo wing isnt enough to make a difference for anything. just a waste of space and 6 holes in my trunk

civic91;244914 wrote:
never thought about that, i always thought it was big enough to see through.

i thought the same thing, untill i got in the car. the wing is in the perfect spot to cut out any vision...well for me atleast.

capitlj;244919 wrote:
Looks a lot better without the wing. Its not a race car its an EVO, if it becomes a race car then put the picnic table back on.

EVO that doesn't look like a shopping cart FTW!!!

Thank you sir.

gsrEK;244923 wrote:
wingless < wing

gsrEK < life.

[gsrEK]

my wing also provides a perfect blindspot also

[no_slow_clap]

gsrEK;244928 wrote:
my wing also provides a perfect blindspot also

join the club

[Rexwagon]

are you sure it doesnt give you enough downforce to be worth it. There was talk about the sti wing on nasioc a while back and someone dug up a company that did testing on it. It actually showed decent amount of downforce at highway speeds. It was showed a shit ton at 140 MPH. So it was important to have at very high speeds. the evo wing looks close to what the sti wing is. I know subaru didnt put theirs on there for looks. Just thought Id share that with you.

here ya go
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1399851&highlight=sti+downforce

[no_slow_clap]

Rexwagon;244972 wrote:
are you sure it doesnt give you enough downforce to be worth it. There was talk about the sti wing on nasioc a while back and someone dug up a company that did testing on it. It actually showed decent amount of downforce at highway speeds. It was showed a shit ton at 140 MPH. So it was important to have at very high speeds. the evo wing looks close to what the sti wing is. I know subaru didnt put theirs on there for looks. Just thought Id share that with you.

here ya go
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1399851&highlight=sti+downforce

The main point of the air flow on the evo come from the vortex generator. if you look at all of the time attack evos they use the bigger "ironing board" style of wing becasue the stock one doesnt do anything for normaly driving.

when are you ever going to go a consistant 140 mph.