Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. The Parking Lot
  4. Ls1 RX7

Ls1 RX7

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Parking Lot
63 Posts 22 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    btleier
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    I think running mixed gas would be a bitch. Therefore, I will keep my OMP. haha

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • GrrG Offline
      GrrG Offline
      Grr
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      zac is hiding under a rock! actually hes been working like 14 hour days every day making $20+ an hour, so i dont blame him. But, I am not aaginst rotaries at all either, i love em in fact. But when it comes down to it they are WAY too fragile to make serious every day HP with. Like when im screwing with boost and shit, I can just lay into it until i hear some serious audiable knock, turn the boost down a little and im fine. On a rotor, ANY audible knock or detonation is some serious shit, and could be your ticket into a new motor at any time.
      Also, when it comes down to it, the reason the rotor makes so much power is because its equivalent to a fuckin 6 cylinder 2- stroke. And yes it is a fuckin 2 stroke i dont care what anybody says. You mix gas, it uses ports instead of valves, and makes a complete combustion cycle in 1 revolution of the cylinder, that my friends is the definition of a 2-stroke. Also, its a 6 banger as it has 6 individual compression chambers.. Im sure every rotary fanboi is gonna try to prove otherwise, but tough shit, it is what it is.
      AND, not baggin on zacs car or anything, shit i helped build the damn thing, BUT, If they are supposed to be sooooo badass, how come i can pull on him on a COMPLETELY STOCK motor with a turbo, in a car that weighs exactly 1000lbs more. now my engine in his car? holy fuck that would be fast. imagine ported heads and some bolt ons and it would do 9's on fuckin pump gas any time. I do like the $300 rebuilds he pulls out of his ass though, that would be sweet, and when we tore the motor/ trans out of it in what was it 2 hours at BI that one night, haha, that was fun.
      BTW, anyone that wants a cheap swap, you can score a complete 5.3 out of a 1/2 ton silverado for about 7-800$, find a T-56 for $1500 shipped and its a damn good combo. you can buy heads, cam, headers the whole works to swap, and when you blow it, pick up a 6.0L shortblock for $500 or so and you got a 500whp motor no problem, should scale about 2700lbs withthat as well.
      Gary

      EDIT: BTW, wankels dont get good milage because every time we go anywhere we gotta keep the thing over 2500rpm or it will fall on its face, and 80mph is just over 3000rpm as well. I can idle around town and never even touch 2000rpm, 80mph, 2590rpm, and it will be about 2300 next year. PLUS, i scored 24mpg in mine on teh highway, and i held it to the floor a number of times on that trip.

      2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
      2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bubbaB Offline
        bubbaB Offline
        bubba
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        Pre-mixing is better for the engine (rotaries). The oil-metering system on them doesn't lubricate the seals near as good as pre-mixing. I know many people that pulled the metering system out and pre-mixed 2 stroke oil in when filling up, if I remember right the oiling system uses 4 stroke oil...which is not made to lubricate when being burned. It's not much of a hassle, just put the right amount of oil in a bottle, dump it in and fill it up...maybe a minute longer to fill up.

        Current Cars:
        08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
        93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
        90 Honda CRX - Project car
        90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

        Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RE-EnemaR Offline
          RE-EnemaR Offline
          RE-Enema
          wrote on last edited by
          #51

          This argument is stupid.

          Both engines are great. The main thing is to keep an equal weight distribution front to rear on a very well engineered chassis. Mazda designed a great looking and one of the best handling sports cars of its time with the FD.

          Neither engine is bad.
          LS1 great power, lots of torque, weighs about the same as a 13b rew.

          Turbo Rotary-quirky, smooth, spools turbos very well, can make good power

          Now if I were to build my dream FD it would be a 3 rotor N/A. You can make approximately 400 hp. Reliable as hell. Weighs the approximately the same as a 13b rew.

          400whp is more than enough for the FD on a large road course. 90% of the drivers on here could barely use the car to its full potential on a track with that sort of power and handling.

          Now here is where I am going to catch some shit. The FD is NOT a drag car. Mazda never intended it to rip down the 1/4 mile. Why would they put all that time, money, and effort into the suspension and chassis? They designed it for handling. If you want a rotary drag car, buy a Starlet, backhalf it, and throw a rotary in it. That would be one hell of a scary ride.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 94NDTA9 Offline
            94NDTA9 Offline
            94NDTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #52

            RE-Enema;176786 wrote:
            This argument is stupid.

            Both engines are great. The main thing is to keep an equal weight distribution front to rear on a very well engineered chassis. Mazda designed a great looking and one of the best handling sports cars of its time with the FD.

            Neither engine is bad.
            LS1 great power, lots of torque, weighs about the same as a 13b rew.

            Turbo Rotary-quirky, smooth, spools turbos very well, can make good power

            Now if I were to build my dream FD it would be a 3 rotor N/A. You can make approximately 400 hp. Reliable as hell. Weighs the approximately the same as a 13b rew.

            400whp is more than enough for the FD on a large road course. 90% of the drivers on here could barely use the car to its full potential on a track with that sort of power and handling.

            Now here is where I am going to catch some shit. The FD is NOT a drag car. Mazda never intended it to rip down the 1/4 mile. Why would they put all that time, money, and effort into the suspension and chassis? They designed it for handling. If you want a rotary drag car, buy a Starlet, backhalf it, and throw a rotary in it. That would be one hell of a scary ride.

            Would you rather have a car with instant TQ/Power, or a high reving NA rotory for a track car (not drag)?

            legacy image

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bubbaB Offline
              bubbaB Offline
              bubba
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              Considering Rx7.com had an N/A FB RX-7 that rans 9's in the 1/4...

              Current Cars:
              08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
              93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
              90 Honda CRX - Project car
              90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

              Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA
                wrote on last edited by
                #54

                bubba;176792 wrote:
                Considering Rx7.com had an N/A FB RX-7 that rans 9's in the 1/4...

                .....Considering what?

                legacy image

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MisterCMKM Offline
                  MisterCMKM Offline
                  MisterCMK
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  94NDTA;176725 wrote:
                  http://www.carsdirect.com/1993/mazda/rx7
                  17/25

                  ....Thats worse than an LS1 (19/28), only with 65 less hp, and about 120 ftlb's less TQ.

                  Thats odd....

                  :icon_scratch:

                  hmm, 400hp Corvette getting at least 26 on the highway what??? :lol: I gotta hand it to chebby boys, they sure do make a good motor.

                  FASTER THAN DUBBSY

                  > thrash;315544 wrote:
                  > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
                  >
                  > Ford is back :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bubbaB Offline
                    bubbaB Offline
                    bubba
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    94NDTA;176800 wrote:
                    .....Considering what?

                    U said NA rotaries cant make drag cars....

                    Current Cars:
                    08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
                    93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
                    90 Honda CRX - Project car
                    90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

                    Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • zbrownZ Offline
                      zbrownZ Offline
                      zbrown
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #57

                      Yes I live, and so does the car still.... now on 20psi with alk. injection and still untuned:(....... that motor has seen far more than its fair share of abuse and it is still running, and i only popped one other motor that i built.... due to my idiocy, ask any that were there, on brittle OEM seals

                      I dont know why everyone is getting out of hand, cant we all get along 🙂
                      I like a SBC just as much as any of you yet i like the rotary too, guess i am weird

                      Just cant beat the incredible simplicity of the rotary setup and the ease of working on them...1.5hr rebuilds at 300 dollars comon

                      ... we'll see (if i ever get back there) for the rotary haters:)...lets say this car is not the same base 12 second car on 10psi and 2.0 60fts....... as it is now on 20psi let alone 30 tuned.... comon the gt42 wasn't even warmed up at 10lbs:)... oh yeah alk injection FTW and 89 pump.... thanks to Parker

                      on 20psi the car feels like a solid 10 second car for sure

                      and just something i wanted to throw out there... there are multiple 1000hp 13bs...... and a boosted 20b will get you your all desired even hp/Tq #s... usually around 500/500 on around 8-10psi

                      there is a LS7 powered fd floating around that i saw....... that even gets me wet

                      rx7-8.89@157mph
                      12v dodge, twins

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KA-T_240
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #58

                        zbrown;176808 wrote:
                        Yes I live, and so does the car still.... now on 20psi with alk. injection and still untuned:(....... that motor has seen far more than its fair share of abuse and it is still running, and i only popped one other motor that i built.... due to my idiocy, ask any that were there, on brittle OEM seals

                        I dont know why everyone is getting out of hand, cant we all get along 🙂
                        I like a SBC just as much as any of you yet i like the rotary, guess i am weird

                        Just cant beat the incredible simplicity of the rotary setup and the ease of working on them...1.5hr rebuilds at 300 dollars comon

                        ... we'll see (if i ever get back there) for the rotary haters:)...lets say this car is not the same base 12 second car on 10psi and 2.0 60fts....... as it is now on 20psi let alone 30 tuned.... comon the gt42 wasn't even warmed up at 10lbs:)

                        on 20psi the car feels like a solid 10 second car for sure

                        and just something i wanted to throw out there... there are multiple 1000hp 13bs...... and a boosted 20b will get you your all desired even hp/Tq #s... usually around 500/500 on around 8-10psi

                        there is is a LS7 powered fd floating around that i saw....... that even gets me wet

                        when you coming back?

                        PM me for:
                        Sandblasting(I use glass beads)
                        Diesel repairs or performance products.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                          ? This user is from outside of this forum
                          Guest
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          not soon enough.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 94NDTA9 Offline
                            94NDTA9 Offline
                            94NDTA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #60

                            bubba;176806 wrote:
                            U said NA rotaries cant make drag cars....

                            No I didn't. I said which would you rather have for the track (not drag strip)

                            I never said they couldn't be drag cars/engines.

                            legacy image

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • GrrG Offline
                              GrrG Offline
                              Grr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #61

                              hes not coming back till right before school starts, gotta make the $$$ while you can! so yeah not soon enough

                              2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                              2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • RE-EnemaR Offline
                                RE-EnemaR Offline
                                RE-Enema
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #62

                                94NDTA;176791 wrote:
                                Would you rather have a car with instant TQ/Power, or a high reving NA rotory for a track car (not drag)?

                                Both would be a good choice. Just depending on preference.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  adog
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #63

                                  So, speaking of quirky engines, does anyone have any experience with the Miller cycle Mazdas?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups