Bike Accident on 25th
-
TwistedAngel;236262 wrote:
No worries. It's just that I'm not a cunt. I'm a bitch. Get it right boys.
I got rid of the tag. There was no need for that. You are right, you are entitled to your opinion....just like everyone is entitled to my opinion as well.
-
TwistedAngel;236101 wrote:
I never said a biker ONLY puts himself in danger when he rides a wheelie. I just said they are the main person in danger because they're usually up against bigger vehicles. Yes, I suppose someone walking or riding a bike could get involved, but the chances are slim.wow, this quote was from page 7 of the thread, so hopefully the author has got the point by now that others were trying to make. People in the area of someone riding a wheelie (or other street-careless manner) are in just as much danger as the rider, probably even more.
Consider this....rider is going down the street on their '02 GSXR 1000, 1st gear, 30 mph.
Rider decides to wik it up and loft the front end, probably going a bit over 30 now to keep it up.
Rider loops it and sends 475lb GSXR cartwheeling or sliding into oncoming traffic or maybe towards the side walk. Bonus, on the way off the back of the bike, rider hangs onto the throttle, giving the gixxer an extra boost as it goes shooting into traffic. Maybe instead of looping out, rider puts it down and ends up in a tank-slapper, losing control.
Either way, maybe the bike hits a pedestrian, maybe the bike cartwheels into the front windshield of the driver coming towards the cartwheeling bike, maybe the car behind the fallen rider locks their brakes to avoid running over said rider, thus getting rear-ended by the car behind them.The rider is not the MAIN person in danger. They are 1 person, endangering themselves and those around them. Hell, in the case of a wheelie, the rider may be in the least danger, as they aren't going to be in front of the 475lb mass they just launched down the street.
That 1 rider endangers many and is certainly not the "main" person in danger.
-
Grr;236282 wrote:
So let me get this straight, people pull out in front of bikes all the time because they dont see them right? So now, go at an excessive speed on a tiny ass bike, and remove the only object that enables someone to see it. Front wheel up =no fucking headlight, no headlight, you arent gonna see shit in the evening with the sun up like it was yesterday.
I am going to go ahead and say that the biker is 100% at fault, unless somehow the investigation discovers the girl was drunk, drugged or something, she had nothing to do with it. Also you people asking about sources? Who are your god damn sources? IMHO chuck is the best source of info for almost anything. Add the fact the he was right fucking there kinda seals the deal that he has more accurate info than most. And chuck says he was straight hauling ass with a compromised field of view, then he was, its the truth. No doubt the girl didnt see him or thought she had plenty of time. Judging by the pics, she damn near got across the road, meaning if he had been doing the speed limit, he wouldnt have hit her, wheelie or not.
/threadIt's true. Chuck is a great source for information. But after I got done reading all this, I can't seem to remember where anything (from anyone for that matter) even saw the girl do anything other than pull out. We do not know if she was distracted. We do not know anything. And no, I'm not butthurt or w/e your ass is sayin brandon. I'm simply stating the counter-facts to all you guys who just want to bitch about the biker.
Call me an asshole, call me a power ranger, call me whatever the fuck you want. I honestly don't give two shits what anyone has to call me via the interwebz. ZOMG YOUR CAN TALK SHIT TYPING.
Some people saw stuff and they stated it. The rest and MOST of this case right now is 99% PURE SPECULATION. Until the FPD releases information, none of us know shit. Yea, you saw him at a excessive rate of speed. Yea, you saw him lift his wheel up. From all of this, thats ALL you saw. TWO things. IMO thats not enough to push 100% the fault on the biker.
Ok, I'm done w/ this post.. I'm tired. I shall continue tomorrow.
Begin your flaming of me because I'm right
EDIT: Btw gary, it was what, 6pm when this happened. IMO you do not need headlights to see someone at 6PM. doesnt start getting dark until 8ish. If you can't see a motorcycle driving in the lane, you better not be driving. If you can't see that, how are you gunna see a pedestrian or a bicyclist for that matter.
-
I feel bad for the family its shity losing a loved one.....more so is kind of situation. If you ride please just wear your helmet. We dont need any thing els for those damn cops to be bitching about.
-
Link;236334 wrote:
its 6pm. if u cant see a moving object coming towards you in broad daylight, you have ZERO reason to be on the road. I fear my life driving around you whether that moving object was going 40mph or 80mph. It's still visible.
if i see someon driving down the road and is a block away... i am going to assume he/she/it is going within the posted spedlimit.... and knowing how fast trafic is passing in front of you gives a just of how long you have to get out into traffic... and if you are trying to get out into traffic and have been sitting for a while, people tend to get impatient... she saw a open spot and went... she had no idea that he was going that fast, it is hard to tell... and now he is dead.. -
-
Get glasses/contacts to help your vision.
-
So what your basically saying is that she was an offensive driver. Don't they teach you to be a DEFENSIVE driver so stuff like this doesnt happen? Any driver with 1/2 a brain will know what 30mph looks like. Now I see someone going far beyond what looks to be 30mph. Pretty sure the first thing a normal driver would think of is to just sit there and wait instead of risking an accident. Obviously she failed at that.
-
-
egs00n;236340 wrote:
I feel bad for the family its shity losing a loved one.....more so is kind of situation. If you ride please just wear your helmet. We dont need any thing els for those damn cops to be bitching about.WTF do "those damn cops" have to do with this thread? STFU and GTFO
-
Link;236346 wrote:
-
Get glasses/contacts to help your vision.
-
So what your basically saying is that she was an offensive driver. Don't they teach you to be a DEFENSIVE driver so stuff like this doesnt happen? Any driver with 1/2 a brain will know what 30mph looks like. Now I see someone going far beyond what looks to be 30mph. Pretty sure the first thing a normal driver would think of is to just sit there and wait instead of risking an accident. Obviously she failed at that.
so... if you were trying to get out into traffic.... you can always judge how fast a small object is moving?
-
-
Link;236346 wrote:
-
Get glasses/contacts to help your vision.
-
So what your basically saying is that she was an offensive driver. Don't they teach you to be a DEFENSIVE driver so stuff like this doesnt happen? Any driver with 1/2 a brain will know what 30mph looks like. Now I see someone going far beyond what looks to be 30mph. Pretty sure the first thing a normal driver would think of is to just sit there and wait instead of risking an accident. Obviously she failed at that.
You don't know what happened. You are basing your assumptions on heresay.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login