This is what happens to slow evos
-
Lol mmmm
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
Cause hes the shit
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
8 second evo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvqOef9_sL0&feature=related
and another
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6hEflwAIcU&feature=relatedand another
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1axhKCqm_F8&feature=relatedget the point yet?? suby's aren't better
2003 Mitsubishi Evolution 8
2011 Ford F150 Ecoboost
-
YellowEvo;236779 wrote:
8 second evohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvqOef9_sL0&feature=related
and another
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6hEflwAIcU&feature=relatedand another
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1axhKCqm_F8&feature=relatedget the point yet?? suby's aren't better
I like evo's too. I just like subaru's better. To each their own.
-
STi's are not great drag cars, their aerodynamics pretty much limits them to ~155 mph...add to that a close gear ratio 6 speed transmission and you can see where the problems lie in getting down the track fast.
WRX & Evo were both designed to be rally cars. Period. But last time I checked, Mitsubishi hasn't won a manufacturers title in WRC since 1998. The last Mitsubishi driven WRC winner was Tommy Makinen back in 1999. Subaru has had far better success in recent years (though still nothing like Citroen) having won in 2001 and 2003.
So in short, Evo's are better at doing things they were never designed to do whereas STi's tend to do well at their intended purpose....
-
DelSlow;236865 wrote:
So there purpose was to have 50 year old women drive rally cars?I meant competitively....primary purpose is go from point a to point b in a safe and reliable manner.
-
tjamz;236864 wrote:
STi's are not great drag cars, their aerodynamics pretty much limits them to ~155 mph...add to that a close gear ratio 6 speed transmission and you can see where the problems lie in getting down the track fast.WRX & Evo were both designed to be rally cars. Period. But last time I checked, Mitsubishi hasn't won a manufacturers title in WRC since 1998. The last Mitsubishi driven WRC winner was Tommy Makinen back in 1999. Subaru has had far better success in recent years (though still nothing like Citroen) having won in 2001 and 2003.
So in short, Evo's are better at doing things they were never designed to do whereas STi's tend to do well at their intended purpose....
Thank you chuck.
Like I said earlier I like evo's as well. I like subaru's way better. Plus I get cruise control. HAHA
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login