spoolude...

[Guest]

Also on honda tech people claim 25 whp gains with a CAI on a D17 (7th gen civic motor)

[Bryce]

Lets just say that most people on this site have Strong opinions, and alot of them own DSM's.

[Guest]

ya heres a race for u dsm owners any year gsx vs s2k
o heres another one evo vs nsx

[24valvenotak]

there a a couple 1G DSMs on here that would have no trouble disposing of an s2000.....

[Guest]

92BlackTT wrote:
there a a couple 1G DSMs on here that would have no trouble disposing of an s2000.....

not stock u dsm's would get run over

[24valvenotak]

You never said stock...what fun is that. Thats like saying a vette could run over a lumina, der a 13 second car (s2000)can beat a fifteen second carstock (DSM). Are you going to tell us the sky is blue or read left to right top to bottom?

[Guest]

wuts a s2000 run compared to the evo the evo would walk on it right?

[24valvenotak]

stating the obvious again here chief...

[Guest]

ok this is old can sombody make somthing else to fight over

[PSI2HI]

spoolude wrote:
ya heres a race for u dsm owners any year gsx vs s2k
o heres another one evo vs nsx

Do some fucking research, S2k's and NSX's are definatly not 1/4 mile monsters.

S2000 vs. EVO, bwahaha, is that supposed to be a joke?

[YellowEvo]

fuck i could stall it, start it up and miss 2nd and still beat it

[Tad218]

correct me if im wrong but dont s2000s run mid 14s stock. 240 hp, 160 tq and evos have 275 and 286 stock and awd. doesnt sound even close

[YellowEvo]

271hp and 275 torque i think... i know about the hp not sure how much tq i had

[Tad218]

whats your stock 1/4 mile?

[Tad218]

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html this is a pretty cool website, it lists all the 0-60 and 1/4 times for stock cars. but it also says a 2G eclipse gst is faster than a 1G eclipse gst and im not sure if thats true

[Tad218]

wow i should find somethin better to do. is this my 3rd post in a row? im goin to bed

[out there]

the s2000 is capable of high 13's stock, as is the evo; that would be an excellent race. nsx... that's the poor man's super car, top gear (british show) has done a couple of episodes about it.
spoolude, you really need to learn to use google before you start posting so much childish drivel

[dynasty_v6]

I'm pretty sure an evo is capableof mid 13's or better? With equal drivers, I could see the evo winning easily. Quick somebody with an evo chime in...

wait but which car is more comfortable, better mpg (holy crap 31 mpg for a gs-t), or burns longer?

[STiSchucky]

92BlackTT wrote:
You never said stock...what fun is that. Thats like saying a vette could run over a lumina, der a 13 second car (s2000)can beat a fifteen second carstock (DSM). Are you going to tell us the sky is blue or read left to right top to bottom?
we read from the top to the bottom? this whole time ive been reading from the bottom up.

[YellowEvo]

all websites say i run a 13.5 stock but never ran it stock... i had cat-back, boost controller, air filter, and a slightly tuned afc when i ran a 13.3 and kevin ran a 13.1... and out there where the hell are you gettin your information... evo's run high 13's???