Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

T

turbogeek

@turbogeek
About
Posts
8
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    92BlackTT wrote:
    "ever hear of a carb".....why are we all still trying to step back in time? There is probably a reason your the only one in your neighborhood who can rebuild one....

    geez.......i knew this comment was coming :rolleyes:

    i was just suggesting a low cost alternative to running fuel injection. not everyone can afford fuel injection on a custom setup. ya gotta start somewhere.

    Car Tech

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    My NOva wrote:
    NO know one has ever heard of a carb Ya jackass

    easy there slugger... 🆒

    Car Tech

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    dubbsy wrote:
    cough

    302 aftermarket is HUGE....
    Run a 347 if it's a drag car, 331 if it'd get a bunch of use. Then have endless choices for heads, intakes, off the shelf cams.....

    i'm quite familiar with the 302 aftermarket...
    do you realize that about 95% of that stuff works on the 351?

    why would I run an expensive 347 stroker, when I could build a less expensive 351 and get similar power figures? or better yet........i could build a 351 stroker for the same cost as a 347

    read what some of these guys are doing.......and tell me the 351 doesn't have better potential.
    http://www.corral.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=55

    not to mention, the 4.2L motor would run off stock electronics...the 302/351....well that'd be interesting.

    ever hear of a carb?

    Car Tech

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    My NOva wrote:
    nah 351 have there limits just like anyother engine

    oh yeah.....i'm not saying they're spectacular or anything. just figuring if you do a swap.........a 351 will have more potential in the long run than a 302....and way more potential than the 3.8 he's talking about.

    Car Tech

  • Anyone turbo a MR2 here????!!!
    T turbogeek

    4AGE was the only engine available in the '86

    Go read the forums on www.mr2oc.com about modding that engine. The general consensus says it's a waste of time and money. Most of those guys just swap in the 4AGZE supercharged engine. Or.....if you look on Ebay...you'll see the JDM 20v'ers show up, like this one:
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7931160471&category=33615

    A swap would be cheaper in the long run.

    The Parking Lot

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    Jim wrote:
    351 are slow

    then you don't know how to build one...

    Car Tech

  • Mustangs
    T turbogeek

    Johnsey wrote:
    The ford v6 isn't the best for handling lots of hp, so if thats what you want get the chevy v6 or a 5.o.

    Exactly. Pull engine....swap in 351.

    Car Tech

  • 1986 MR2 Must Sell!!
    T turbogeek

    any info on the car? miles? price? where is it located?

    Classifieds
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups