Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. Run Your Mouth
  4. limits of walbro 255 pump, 600hp

limits of walbro 255 pump, 600hp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Run Your Mouth
93 Posts 32 Posters 6.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • GrrG Offline
    GrrG Offline
    Grr
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    very true, it is dropping for sure, hell, the more i think about it, it might even be a walbro 307, thats a little weaker in the high psi ranges than a 340, but its been years since i bought the damn thing.
    And magical thoughts? a 4l80E transmission has the ability to read input shaft torque, it isnt magic to turn a torque # into a HP number, every dyno in the world does it. And, there is no way to fudge the presented input torque, also the calculation is the same one used by every dyno produced, so if what the tranny in my car sees is magical, then i guess every dyno sheet is magical too. Look at any STS, rearmount system, on a stock car, say a LS1 camaro, dynos 320whp stock. STS on 8psi? if you cant get at least 420whp out of that, shoot yourself. thats a solid 100whp gain any day of the week, well a 100hp gain on my motor is AT LEAST 540 crank hp. Get a life.
    On the other hand, there are so many turbo LS1 f-bodys and vettes that get over 20mpg, i wont even get into it.
    Gary

    2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
    2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 94NDTA9 Offline
      94NDTA9 Offline
      94NDTA
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      I beleive everyone was thinking you were refering to whp #'s, not crank.

      FYI, I plan on making ~500 RWHP on a walbro 255 this year. It's not a standard walbro, it's a racetronix. I beleive it is modified to provide a higher fuel pressure. I firmly beleive I won't have any problem with making that (almost 600 crank).

      legacy image

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • killer69penguinK Offline
        killer69penguinK Offline
        killer69penguin
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        krzydrftr93;166101 wrote:
        and gets how many miles to the gallon.

        look at his teg for instance. That car is pretty damn fast and its a 4 banger Ibet if he drove it as a DD(not sureif he does or not) but i bet he would get over twice the mileage you do and still go as fast at the track:icon_thumleft:

        i dont believe he made this thread to compair who gets better gas millage, it seems alright to me, as for you go buy a geo and be happy

        1993 3000GT VR4

        Previous: 95 Eclipse, 98 Civic, 72 Mustang, 96 Eclipse Spyder, 03 Tiburon, 93 Prelude, 94 Del Sol, 95 Integra, 95 Civic, 94 GMC Serria

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • integra_gsr98I Offline
          integra_gsr98I Offline
          integra_gsr98
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          So what is 540 crank HP to the wheels through a 4L80E slushbox? 90 hp less?

          And I should probably shoot myself I've only made 311 HP per liter so far, and I am only on pace to make over 400 HP per liter this year. Man, imagine what us stupid 4 cylinder guys could do with 6 liters! Haha.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • GrrG Offline
            GrrG Offline
            Grr
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            your such a fag, zac can probably make 450hp/liter, big deal, i have all stock shit. wish i had rich parents.

            2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
            2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DrifterExtremeD Offline
              DrifterExtremeD Offline
              DrifterExtreme
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              integra_gsr98;166113 wrote:
              So what is 540 crank HP to the wheels through a 4L80E slushbox? 90 hp less?

              And I should probably shoot myself I've only made 311 HP per liter so far, and I am only on pace to make over 400 HP per liter this year. Man, imagine what us stupid 4 cylinder guys could do with 6 liters! Haha.

              Remember gsr horsepower means nothing if you just sit at the rev limiter all the way down the track.... i can see it now no traction ever... but did you see my sweet 400hp per liter..OMGHI2OH

              legacy image

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Snap!

                🍿

                legacy image

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • integra_gsr98I Offline
                  integra_gsr98I Offline
                  integra_gsr98
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Grr:

                  1. If I had rich parents that helped me mod my car, that would be sweet. I too wish I had rich parents.
                  2. Rotarys could technically be treated as 2.6L motors due to their design.

                  Traction is difficult, but I guess we'll see what this year has in store. Chassis work is sweet.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 94NDTA9 Offline
                    94NDTA9 Offline
                    94NDTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Can anyone barrow me their rich parents for a year? Please?

                    Oh dang, guess I will have to just pay for it myself.

                    Also, I beleive, and correct me if I am wrong, nicks cars has clocked a faster 1/4 mile time, which really is the only thing that matters....

                    legacy image

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • GrrG Offline
                      GrrG Offline
                      Grr
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      BTW, it is a walbro 307, that is sooooooo gay. Im actuall kinda pissed about it. On the buick board, they say 550hp with a 307, 640 hpwith a 340 i guess a nice new walbro 340 should be good for another 75hp than this shitty 307 with 40k miles on it. Damn it anyway.

                      2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                      2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • GrrG Offline
                        GrrG Offline
                        Grr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        i could give 2 flying shits about anyones times, i built this car for me, the way i wanted it. With no cage, and a assload of torque. BTW, logging the tourque input shows a sweet 600ft-lbs+ from 3500-4200, im gonna put so many miles on this bitch its gonna be sweet, and i wont put a bar in it anyway, so timeslips mean nothing
                        Gary

                        2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                        2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 94NDTA9 Offline
                          94NDTA9 Offline
                          94NDTA
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Well, congrats on making a car that you enjoy driving.

                          And I wasn't neccisarltlyu directing that comment towards you...

                          legacy image

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • GrrG Offline
                            GrrG Offline
                            Grr
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            guess i could finish putting that turbo on my drag sled, mach Z 800 long track, that is an easy low 9 sec sled, hell my turbo'd 440 drag sled did low 11's, N/A, not that im competitive or anything

                            2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                            2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 94NDTA9 Offline
                              94NDTA9 Offline
                              94NDTA
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              You don't seem competative.

                              legacy image

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Turbo5OhT Offline
                                Turbo5OhT Offline
                                Turbo5Oh
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                DrifterExtreme;166116 wrote:
                                Remember gsr horsepower means nothing if you just sit at the rev limiter all the way down the track.... i can see it now no traction ever... but did you see my sweet 400hp per liter..OMGHI2OH

                                might wanna check ur info before u start sounding like an idiot.
                                have u seen gsr's 60 foots? have u drivin a truely fast car? i know the answer to these by ur comments in ur post. driving a 10 sec car is a little diff then ur 15 sec car. did u know that holding a turbo 5 speed car on the rev limiter through the shift holds boost pressure? which in return brings little to no turbo lag? but then again by ur comments u have no idea whats ur talking about

                                there is alot of assumtions about nicks car. yes he makes a lot of power, yes that much power in a non fwd street car would provide faster ET's

                                Grr;166114 wrote:
                                your such a fag, zac can probably make 450hp/liter, big deal, i have all stock shit. wish i had rich parents.

                                so how are ur measuring flywheel TQ? is there some magic genie hanging on to ur crank telling whats going on down there? these are outragous bench racing claims at best

                                and speaking of the rich parents thing. how much did u pay for ur gto before ur burnt it down? money is money just becuase he has an older car that he decided to put money into modding it instead of buying a brand new car for the same money doest mean he had parental sponsorships, ive known nick for a while and i know what he has done to the car the last few years and i know that his parents are not footing the bill. i think he might be getting a little old for that by now anyway

                                2 more people for my long list of D-bags

                                LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE IN A WELL PRESERVED BODY, BUT RATHER TO SKID IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT, SHOUTING ' HOLY SHIT.....WHAT A RIDE'

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • GrrG Offline
                                  GrrG Offline
                                  Grr
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  have you ever been inside a new computer system? obviously not. new computerized trannys can tell you all sorts of wonderful things. Its read by the computer in any OBD-2 equipped GM vehicle, and ford, and dodge. how do you think traction control systems, torque reduction and ABS systems work. Its all in there from the factory, so magic genie your own shit.
                                  Fast 60's eh, it better be WELL into the 1.4 range to be considered fast, especially on slicks, i did high 1.6's in this GN when it was BONE STOCK, with sticky street tires. If anyone is a d-bag, it is you sir.

                                  2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                                  2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • wesholeW Offline
                                    wesholeW Offline
                                    weshole
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    I can see where this thread is going. Thread moved to a more "suitable" location.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Turbo5OhT Offline
                                      Turbo5OhT Offline
                                      Turbo5Oh
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Grr;166128 wrote:
                                      have you ever been inside a new computer system? obviously not. new computerized trannys can tell you all sorts of wonderful things. Its read by the computer in any OBD-2 equipped GM vehicle, and ford, and dodge. how do you think traction control systems, torque reduction and ABS systems work. Its all in there from the factory, so magic genie your own shit.
                                      Fast 60's eh, it better be WELL into the 1.4 range to be considered fast, especially on slicks, i did high 1.6's in this GN when it was BONE STOCK, with sticky street tires. If anyone is a d-bag, it is you sir.

                                      please try not to explain on board computers to me, im a ase and gm certified tech. i daily work on vehicles with with up to 25-30 diff control modules let alone training with hybrid vehicles

                                      what exactly is measuring rotating force (aka torque)? yes i understand u can get an estimate with input and loads but like i said estimate

                                      speaking of being a gm tech, i work on gto's once in a while and ive never had a dealer serviced one randomly burn to the ground? so my question is why would a newer vehicle like this burn to the ground other then faulty installation of a after market part? maybe a n2o kit? hmm i think we should all be taking advice from somebody that cant safely work on a vehicle with out sending it to the scrap yard

                                      hmm yep proving the d-bag theory once again

                                      LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE IN A WELL PRESERVED BODY, BUT RATHER TO SKID IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT, SHOUTING ' HOLY SHIT.....WHAT A RIDE'

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • torbsT Offline
                                        torbsT Offline
                                        torbs
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        runs and grabs popcorn

                                        Current vehicles: 90 Civic Hatch, 95 Civic Sedan, 93 Del Sol, 95 Civic Coupe, 99 Integra GS
                                        Past vehicles: 78 Malibu 2dr., 88 Riviera, 90 Laser RS-T, 91 Audi 90 quattro, 93 Del Sol, 90 TSI AWD, 92 Integra GSR, 94 Del Sol, 93 Prelude Si, 97 Civic Coupe, 88 Toyota MR2 Supercharged, 94 Lexus GS300, 89 CRX, 06 Vento Zip, 90 Civic hatch, 98 Honda Civic, 99 Honda Civic, 92 Yamaha XJ600S, 87 4WD Subaru GL, 94 Audi 90CS Quattro, 00 Civic EX Coupe, 04 Dodge SRT-4, 89 Corolla GTS (Silvertop), 95 Del Sol

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          KA-T_240
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          So, what is going on in this thread? First talking about maxing out a fuel pump, now this has turned into a thread compairing E-penis size.

                                          Who gives a shit, let him think what he wants, if he is proved wrong later, so be it. Also dealerships don't always to the best work you can possibly get, yes they are "factory trained" or what ever, but they still dont always catch everything or get everything back the way it should be.

                                          PM me for:
                                          Sandblasting(I use glass beads)
                                          Diesel repairs or performance products.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups