2009 Challenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
sorry to get back on topic lol, but I just saw a thing SPEED at el mirage and they got one to go 170 mph, it had a 5.7 and stated 425 hp. Just thought i'd add that.
-
Briggs&Stratton;240933 wrote:
sorry to get back on topic lol, but I just saw a thing SPEED at el mirage and they got one to go 170 mph, it had a 5.7 and stated 425 hp. Just thought i'd add that.wow... pretty sure i've been in a certain members 4cyl (dont remember the exact size but started as a 2.4) at close to those speeds... and in hondas that produce that hp...
-
bubba;240940 wrote:
wow... pretty sure i've been in a certain members 4cyl (dont remember the exact size but started as a 2.4) at close to those speeds... and in hondas that produce that hp...thats nothing. I have a 3406B cat that has the same hp stock, and will do those speeds with some extreme gear ratio changing and maybe a double OD tranny. haha. But that wasnt my point with the OG post.
I think 170 is pretty fast for an out of the box production american car. And the same with 425 horse.
although you pretty much wont ever find me chasing a new anything unless its GM.
-
KA-T_240;240958 wrote:
Corvettes do 170, SRT4 Neons do 160, and there are more.....yep, you are right. Almost 1% of the makes and models produced in america are capable of what the challenger is. 1%, thats pretty much everything, right? Challenger? bah....sigh....awfully pedestrian in its accomplishments.
-
Briggs&Stratton;240963 wrote:
yep, you are right. Almost 1% of the makes and models produced in america are capable of what the challenger is. 1%, thats pretty much everything, right? Challenger? bah....sigh....awfully pedestrian in its accomplishments.Yep.. that's why u mod a used car so u have half the money into it and out perform some silly new car... but that's just how i see things...
-
bubba;241003 wrote:
Yep.. that's why u mod a used car so u have half the money into it and out perform some silly new car... but that's just how i see things...Agreed.
-
Gotta say I'm not that impressed with the new Challenger. I like the car, especially the aesthetic, but it kinda feels like it should have been built 4 years ago.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
00Accord;241254 wrote:
4 years ago they shouldn't have raped the name "Charger" and done that shit right.+1 its a good car, but Intrepid would have fit just fine.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
http://www.local10.com/news/17704542/detail.html
and it refers to it as a sports car. Cars with a rear seat are considered a sports car?
-
Briggs&Stratton;241751 wrote:
http://www.local10.com/news/17704542/detail.htmland it refers to it as a sports car. Cars with a rear seat are considered a sports car?
... Burst in to flames. Sounds like quality!
-
top notch.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login