Sport Compact Turbo Evo/Sti event
-
Trafik Jamz;277189 wrote:
He didn't edit anything Zac, I just ran a side-by-side comparison.K, then i was wrong and didn't see where he had said it. it just seemed obvious that he had went back and edited the post because it had been edited
no_slow_clap;277198 wrote:
believe what you want, stretching the gears out to 8500 btw. if you want to get literal.believe what you want, but ive got 4 other people that can back me up.
LOL... I believe math... not you..... there is so much shit out your mouth
What size of tires are on your car?? they look to be 245/45-17's
which have an overall diameter of 25.7 inches and a radius of 12.8"
so lets figure your 8500 rpm redline
and the correct gear ratios provided
LOL it is 101.4 mph @ 8500 rpm
jesus dude, just admit that you were either
a. not trapping 120 and using 3rd gear
b. trapping 120 but using 4th
c. or you had a 200mph tail wind and you either went to neutral or held the clutch in when you got to the top of 3rd
LOL, "I have four other guys that can back me up" are you serious??
I have fucking mathematical certainty backing me up
-
Oh and shooter here you go.... plug the #'s in that or any other calculator
-
zbrown;277210 wrote:
K, then i was wrong and didn't see where he had said it. it just seemed obvious that he had went back and edited the post because it had been editedLOL... I believe math... not you..... there is so much shit out your mouth
What size of tires are on your car?? they look to be 245/45-17's
which have an overall diameter of 25.7 inches and a radius of 12.8"
so lets figure your 8500 rpm redline
and the correct gear ratios provided
LOL it is 101.4 mph @ 8500 rpm
jesus dude, just admit that you were either
a. not trapping 120 and using 3rd gear
b. trapping 120 but using 4th
c. or you had a 200mph tail wind and you either went to neutral or held the clutch in when you got to the top of 3rd
LOL, "I have four other guys that can back me up" are you serious??
I have fucking mathematical certainty backing me up
I have nothing to admit. Your math can be flawed. does your math figure in launching? i was almost at 100 at the 1/8 mile.
how about i make a video of me going to top of third and you will see? you are one stubborn fuck. going every which way to try and tell me i am wrong about my OWN CAR. sounds like a hint of jelousy to me.
you dont even know the amount of power my car puts down.
-
no_slow_clap;277214 wrote:
I have nothing to admit. Your math can be flawed. does your math figure in launching? i was almost at 100 at the 1/8 mile.how about i make a video of me going to top of third and you will see? you are one stubborn fuck. going every which way to try and tell me i am wrong about my OWN CAR. sounds like a hint of jelousy to me.
you dont even know the amount of power my car puts down.
Are you truly that dumb to think that launching, power, or whatever else has anything to do with the laws of a fucking simple gear ratio???
wow dude you need to go back to 7th grade
can someone with even a third of a brain give there 2 cents here
and yes, I am extremely "jelous" (jealous)...
-
yea, launching wont have anything to do with a trap speed, neither does shift speed or power. thats really smart.
so while i was still at 256 awhp, i would have trapped the exact same...because my gear ratio was the same? kinda confused about that one.
and my tune is with a 9k redline. i was shifting at 8500.
-
BTW, using your sweet calculator. pluging in final drive a gear ratio i got 190mph.
what numbers are you using?
-
no_slow_clap;277182 wrote:
Then why dont you got back in you browser history and read it, then take a screen shot and post it.I might be arrogant, but im not retarted. If you really think im that full of shit, then you will go outta your way to prove me wrong.
...nice :rolleyes::rolleyes:
-
no_slow_clap;277218 wrote:
yea, launching wont have anything to do with a trap speed, neither does shift speed or power. thats really smart.so while i was still at 256 awhp, i would have trapped the exact same...because my gear ratio was the same? kinda confused about that one.
and my tune is with a 9k redline. i was shifting at 8500.
there is no use:(..... do you have any brain activity?
no_slow_clap;277220 wrote:
BTW, using your sweet calculator. pluging in final drive a gear ratio i got 190mph.what numbers are you using?
you just proved my point on said lack of brain activity....
you realize that when it asks for loaded tire radius, that it is different than a diameter
so once again...
3rd gear ratio 1.41
rear ratio 4.53
loaded tire <u>radius</u> 12.8" -
wow, this thread is full of win! And i have to agree with zbrown 100% here, your an idiot for trying to pull of lies on this board. You were either
a. using 4th
b. using 5th (if 4th is SOOOO blown out)
c. NOT trapping nearly that fast.
d. lying out your assim guessing d.
BTW, yes, your evo is still a FWD piece of shit, (FWD biased driveline) and you would have been far better off to go fast in a LSx car, like zbrown said as well. OH NO, my LSx powered buick ran low 11s and would trap 125-130 on pump with no intercooler, drive it to the track and to work everyday getting 25mpg, and how many times did it break ANYTHING in the driveline? not once, even at 650whp when i had 112 octane in it. My 600+whp T/A, hasnt broken once either?
nothing but failure going on here, hate all you want but just admit you are lying
-
no_slow_clap;277220 wrote:
BTW, using your sweet calculator. pluging in final drive a gear ratio i got 190mph.what numbers are you using?
Damn, your car can do 190 mph in 3rd gear?? That is mad impressive (just like your math skills)......
-
Grr;277247 wrote:
wow, this thread is full of win! And i have to agree with zbrown 100% here, your an idiot for trying to pull of lies on this board. You were either
a. using 4th
b. using 5th (if 4th is SOOOO blown out)
c. NOT trapping nearly that fast.
d. lying out your assim guessing d.
BTW, yes, your evo is still a FWD piece of shit, (FWD biased driveline) and you would have been far better off to go fast in a LSx car, like zbrown said as well. OH NO, my LSx powered buick ran low 11s and would trap 125-130 on pump with no intercooler, drive it to the track and to work everyday getting 25mpg, and how many times did it break ANYTHING in the driveline? not once, even at 650whp when i had 112 octane in it. My 600+whp T/A, hasnt broken once either?
nothing but failure going on here, hate all you want but just admit you are lying
I could give a shit less about what your car can do. its YOUR car, not mine. If you wanna swing of zbrowns nuts, then go right ahead. Im not stopping you.
You guys are just a bunch of tools. pissed of because a 4 cylinder is fast, and OMG i broke something. big deal.
The glory of it all is, I still have the money to fix it.
If your are really that concerned about MY track times, then either call up Andrewtech and see what trans they gave me, or call BSD and see if their timing system was messed up. Until then, worry about your own.
I have nothing to "admit" to anyone, you all are just a bunch of stubborn fucks.
-
lol so why not just settle it the easy way and post a vid where you can see the time board and hear the shifts??
you call me stubborn but yet you will sit and defend a lie all day
lol..."pissed of because a 4 cylinder is fast".... are you kidding??...... the whole reason i got into this thread was to defend fast honda "econo boxes"
and then stayed because of the lies out your mouth
I would have to say that I am still lost in how you have that supposed big government job with non existent math know how
guessing you got a 14 in science reasoning and math on your ACT
-
zbrown;277379 wrote:
lol so why not just settle it the easy way and post a vid where you can see the time board and hear the shifts??you call me stubborn but yet you will sit and defend a lie all day
lol..."pissed of because a 4 cylinder is fast".... are you kidding??...... the whole reason i got into this thread was to defend fast honda "econo boxes"
and then stayed because of the lies out your mouth
I would have to say that I am still lost in how you have that supposed big government job with non existent math know how
guessing you got a 14 in science reasoning and math on your ACT
If i had a video i would post it up. but it would be kinda hard to video and race at the same time.
You tried to tell me i had 27xxx dollars into my car, which is false.
You tried to tell me that i was editing posts, just to make myself sound smart. when it was you that over looked my point.
You tried to tell me that there are 2 hatches (gold, and white) that are faster (yes) and together have less money that i have in my car (no).
You are hunting for a reason to make me fess up to something, when i have nothing to fess up to.
Go ahead, run you mouth about me, my job, and my reading skills. But at the end of the day, im not worried about losing my job or $$$, my car will get fixed, and ill make it back out to the track.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login