Fuck you
-
wannabe wrote:
tacosupreme, cmk said he doesnt like mexican food, come jump his ass with knives! and bring all your cousins and uncles, ESSSAAAYYYOh I know you're not bringing me into this punto.
I'll fuck all your mothers while I make you watch and jerk off to it.
And if you think you can step to this Manic Hispanic, you need to pull your head out of your white bread shittin ass.
Don't mess with something that can bite back. ARF ARF!
-
Spoollude wrote:
Fuk you MR CMYK!why can yoyu hate on my car when yours is twice the size engine wise it is not fair also even with half the engine my car can still kick yours ass h8er
Mabye you just need twice the cylinders to move your asss OHH GOT YOU GOOD
fag
so what you're saying is "I'm a fucktard for buying a motor with less displacement then some pop bottles and trying to make it fast, therefor i use my retardation as an excuse for losing like most ricers"
-
So you got 86fc3s and Joel to take the bait, pretty impressive!
And to those who want to archive a Mustang owner saying their car is slow stock, any educated owner knows their car is slow stock (unless they own a cobra or a newer GT). 99% of cars are slow stock.
-
Thats the best part though. I would much rather have a V8 that revs to 19,000 than one that only revs to say 5500. Plus think of all the technology put into those engines, anyone can make 700hp out of a large displacement V8, but to do it out of a 2.4L one is simply amazing.
-
plus it sounds awesome when your revving to 19,000 rpms!
-
nissankingcab wrote:
Thats the best part though. I would much rather have a V8 that revs to 19,000 than one that only revs to say 5500.what the fuck for?
So you can wait 3 days to hit the powerband?
probably only makes 15HP up until 17,500 when v-tak kicks in.
-
wannabe wrote:
atleast it has a power band! what was your best time at the track dubbsy?everything has a powerband... I'll take mine down where it's accessible.
....who cares what my best time was? I drove a stock 4000lb car. Atleast it's not a honda, that's all I'm worried about.
-
on an F1 car, it will rev FAST.
I'll take one of these thank you!
-
XJHEAD wrote:
Really....Yep. lolz
-
nissankingcab wrote:
Thats the best part though. I would much rather have a V8 that revs to 19,000 than one that only revs to say 5500. Plus think of all the technology put into those engines, anyone can make 700hp out of a large displacement V8, but to do it out of a 2.4L one is simply amazing.:icon_scratch: import sac riders confuse me... lets see, you could have 700 hp at your feet with a lot of tq to back it up or you can wait forever for your car to rev to make any power at all with HORRIBLE street manners. How do you think a 19000 rpm car idles?
Hey lets have a pain in the ass, barely able to tolerate on the street car because it revs high and has cool technology over one that tears ass anytime you feel like stomping on the loud pedal.:icon_thumleft: its all good though, when people make fun of you for stalling the car and how much of a dog it is when your trying to get from A to B you can just tell them "but it revs to 19k and has cool technology"
I'm not saying new tech and all that isn't cool, just that i see no reason to spend more for less.
-
USAlx50 wrote:
:icon_scratch: import sac riders confuse me... lets see, you could have 700 hp at your feet with a lot of tq to back it up or you can wait forever for your car to rev to make any power at all with HORRIBLE street manners. How do you think a 19000 rpm car idles?Hey lets have a pain in the ass, barely able to tolerate on the street car because it revs high and has cool technology over one that tears ass anytime you feel like stomping on the loud pedal.:icon_thumleft: its all good though, when people make fun of you for stalling the car and how much of a dog it is when your trying to get from A to B you can just tell them "but it revs to 19k and has cool technology"
I'm not saying new tech and all that isn't cool, just that i see no reason to spend more for less.
I was leaning on the principle of the matter, not necessarily an argument on streetability (OBVIOUSLY thats why they don't put 19000rpm engines in street cars). Anyways, big pushrod engines = old technology IMO. Not that you can't make big power out of, or enjoy a pushrod engine, but I find it much more impressive to make big power out of a smaller engine. On the the "forever to rev" part, that's what lightweight titanium internals are for! As for low end torque, sure V8s will have it in buckets, but top end in a pushrod engine is thrashy at best, and not the "song" of a VVT OHC engine. As I see it, I would gladly sacrifice low-end torque for a more enjoyable driving experience.
This goes along with the never-ending 4-cyl vs. V8 argument. People will always stand by what they drive and argue until eternity on the subject. I'm merely stating these things as my opinion and nothing more. Everyone has the right to enjoy their car no matter what it has for an engine. (Although we all know I6s are the best anyway :icon_thumright:)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login