Anybody done cams?
-
if you look at it the 3.8 should be able to put out a better power/displacement ratio...i did the math once but i cant remember how much more displcaement per hole there is. V6 should be able to carve better due to less weight so a fairly decently built V6 should be a good all around vehicle.
-
Sheeran;316589 wrote:
if you look at it the 3.8 should be able to put out a better power/displacement ratio...i did the math once but i cant remember how much more displcaement per hole there is. V6 should be able to carve better due to less weight so a fairly decently built V6 should be a good all around vehicle.Really? Your going to argue the power/displacement and weight argument?
I would love to see a mustang "carve" better because it has a v6 vs v8. come on.....
-
im not a mustang guy at all their kind of like civics everyones got one, but the potential of a motor has to do with HP/liter and HP/cylinder and the 3.8 is able to put out fairly impressive numbers in both aspects. Carve better means Auto-X type stuff. Its got less weight in the front so theoretically it should be better at that sort of thing.
but sorry i forgot this is Fargo Street where your nobody unless you flame people untill you have a post count above 5k when you get it reset and you now have to post worthless crap everywhere to get back your mighty power. All im trying to do is have a discussion on v6 mustangs getting cams.
-
for the price of a good set of cams you could pick up a 5.0-4.6 swap? or at least be in the ball park, and you'll be way out ahead as far as power. or at least that's how i'd look at it. And with there being people volunteering to help you do cams i'm sure they'd be just as happy to help you do a motor swap.
-
Ok I see what you mean by it being lighter, not sure how much that would help since handling characteristics center around the weight distribution and center of gravity location more than the overall weight of the car. A lighter car will feel quicker and more nimble maybe though, and less sprung mass bouncing and swaying over the suspension should help some. Not saying it wouldn't help but weight distribution would be have to be looked at I would think because a heavier V8 car with better weight distribution still could potentially handle better. By displacement per hole im assuming you mean displacement per cylinder and I still don't understand how you're translating displacment/cylinder into power/displacment. That just doesn't make sense.
I agree with Heath. I mean if you wanna do this just to be different I guess I respect that but if you want to be truely fast I don't think dumping money into the 3.8 is the way to do it. Especially if you're young and don't have much money to spare. You'll end up dropping a huge chunk of change to be running 13's when you coulda spent the same amount or less and be running 10's
-
Sheeran;316595 wrote:
im not a mustang guy at all their kind of like civics everyones got one, but the potential of a motor has to do with HP/liter and HP/cylinder and the 3.8 is able to put out fairly impressive numbers in both aspects. Carve better means Auto-X type stuff. Its got less weight in the front so theoretically it should be better at that sort of thing.but sorry i forgot this is Fargo Street where your nobody unless you flame people untill you have a post count above 5k when you get it reset and you now have to post worthless crap everywhere to get back your mighty power. All im trying to do is have a discussion on v6 mustangs getting cams.
The 3.8 is a turd, you can polish a turd but its still going to be a turd no matter how you look at it. An you sound like a ricer with this hp/liter crap. And idk how much more does a v8 weigh 50 pounds? If this is the mustang i think it is i had an old exploder that i beat it with when i was like 15 lol. My snowmobile puts out over 150hp/liter does that mean he should throw a 2 stroke in there? No you can have 150hp/liter but still ONLY have 150 hp. They made the v6 mustang for a reason to sell cars to women.
-
zbrown;316632 wrote:
hmmm..... can't be any worse than throwing money at a stock block 5.0 can it??best bang for the buck is the lsx.... just look at what Christian does
302s cheaper with basic mods. 5.7s and T56s aren't the cheapest. 5.3s aren't to bad.
-
XJHEAD;316641 wrote:
Well not enough anyways.Word.
-
Well thanks for all the advice guys. haha i guess i'll just keep my turd polished until i can afford to make it a fast turd or a v8.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login