Porsche Cayman S
-
they are mid engine, you are correct.
http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-s/featuresandspecs/
http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/boxster/boxster-s/featuresandspecs/for the $4000 difference between Boxter S ($54,700) and Cayman S ($58,900), I'd take the Cayman S.
-
IDK, its hard to beat the handling characteristics of a car with a roof on it.
-
tjamz wrote:
IDK, its hard to beat the handling characteristics of a car with a roof on it.
Right on brother! the roof is were it's at! -
weshole wrote:
OH, REALLY?......Generally speaking, I stand by my words....for example a convertible corvette doesn't handle as well as a hardtop. Cars specifically designed to be convertibles tend to do better than those that were "converted" into ragtops as a marketing technique. So, I'd say that yes the boxster was designed for drop top operation, but I'd be willing to bet that the Cayman can outperform it due to the added structural benefit of having a roof.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login